Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201886›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2023

A Systematic Review of Dietary Interventions for Cancer Survivors and Their Families or Caregivers.

Jingle Xu, Rebecca L Hoover, Nathaniel Woodard, Jennifer Leeman, Rachel Hirschey

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingle XuSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrington Hall, 120 N. Medical Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1287-8243
Rebecca L HooverSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrington Hall, 120 N. Medical Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0695-6348
Nathaniel WoodardLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 450 West Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Jennifer LeemanSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrington Hall, 120 N. Medical Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Rachel HirscheySchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrington Hall, 120 N. Medical Dr., Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Cancer Care Quality Training ProgramT32CA116339 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ETHAN M. BASCH, Stephanie Brooke Wheeler · 2018 to 2026
$3.0M
Physical activity intervention co-created and pilot tested with African American Colorectal Cancer SurvivorsK23MD015719 · NIMHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HIRSCHEY, RACHEL · 2021 to 2025
$795k
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA116339NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD015719NIMHD NIH HHS K23 MD015719-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family or caregiver engagement has the potential to support healthy dietary changes among cancer survivors. However, little is known about these family- or caregiver-involved dietary interventions and their effects. This systematic review aimed to identify the behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in dietary interventions for cancer survivors and their families or caregivers and to synthesize intervention effects on dietary and health outcomes. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted systematic searches in three databases and identified 12 trials (16 peer-reviewed manuscripts) for inclusion in this review. Data were extracted from these manuscripts and the BCT taxonomy was used to identify the BCTs. A total of 38 BCTs were identified from 12 trials, 13 of which were used in at least half of the 12 trials. Ten studies reported significant intervention effects on health outcomes (e.g., adiposity) and six suggested significant improvements in dietary behaviors (e.g., fruit and vegetable intake). Overall, this review found that family- or caregiver-involved interventions for cancer survivors significantly improved dietary and health outcomes. Future research should identify BCTs particularly for dietary changes and develop effective dyadic strategies to facilitate diet-related interactions between survivors and their families or caregivers to enhance their engagement in healthy diets.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdiposityCaregiversHumansSurvivorsbehavior change techniquescancer survivorscaregiversdietfamilysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38201886
PMCPMC10780967
OpenAlexW4390176458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.