Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201843›Full record

ArticleNutrients2023

Long-Term Management of Patients with Mild Urea Cycle Disorders Identified through the Newborn Screening: An Expert Opinion for Clinical Practice.

Albero Burlina, Serena Gasperini, Giancarlo la Marca, Andrea Pession, Barbara Siri, Marco Spada, Margherita Ruoppolo, Albina Tummolo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Interpretation of the "Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal hyperammonemia"].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Albero BurlinaDivision of Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Reference Centre for Expanded Newborn Screening, University Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7724-137X
Serena GasperiniInherited Metabolic Unit Disorders, Pediatric Department, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, 20900 Monza, Italy.
Giancarlo la MarcaNewborn Screening Lab, IRCCS Meyer Children's Hospital, Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, University of Florence, 50139 Firenze, Italy.
Andrea PessionPediatric Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0379-9562
Barbara SiriDivision of Metabolic Diseases and Hepatology, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Marco SpadaDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.
Margherita RuoppoloDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Medical Biotechnology, University of Naples, Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7364-0602
Albina TummoloDepartment of Metabolic Diseases and Clinical Genetics and Diabetology, Giovanni XXIII Children Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Consorziale, 70126 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8823-8061
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITBambino Gesù Children's Hospital · ITCeinge Biotecnologie Avanzate (Italy) · ITMeyer Children's Hospital · ITOspedale Pediatrico Giovanni XXIII · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

Immedica
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urea cycle disorders (UCDs) are a group of rare inborn errors of metabolism caused by a deficiency in one of the six enzymes or one of the two transporters involved in the urea cycle. Current guidelines suggest that early diagnosis and treatment of mild UCDs may improve survival and prevent decompensation and neurocognitive impairment. Nevertheless, clinical studies are very difficult to carry out in this setting due to the rarity of the diseases, and high-level evidence is scant and insufficient to draw conclusions and provide clinical guidelines. With the early introduction of newborn screening, the Italian healthcare organization fostered an advancement in expertise in metabolic disease management and screening programs, by allocating resources, and favoring the expansion of newborn screening. A group of experts operating in Italian centers decided to share their experience and provide advice for the management of mild UCDs in clinical practice. A consensus was reached by the Estimate-Talk-Estimate (ETE) method. Five items were identified, and statements for each item were agreed. Briefly, the panel advised completing the diagnosis by expanded newborn screening (ENS) with biochemical and genetic confirmation and by following up with the patient during the first year of life, with a routine laboratory and metabolic profile as well as with clinical observation. Early initiation of therapy is advised and should be followed by therapy adjustment once the diagnostic profile is completed. The therapy should be based on a low-protein diet and nitrogen scavengers. The long-term follow-up is based on growth and nutritional assessment, clinical and neurocognitive evaluation, and laboratory and instrumental parameter monitoring.

Indexed as

Urea Cycle Disorders, InbornCognitionConsensusHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal Screeningexpanded newborn screeningfollow-upnitrogen scavengersurea cycle disorders

Identifiers

PMID38201843
PMCPMC10780676
OpenAlexW4390033543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.