ArticlePolymers2023
Propagation of Sounds through Small Panels Made of Polymer Materials by 3D Printing.
Article in Polymers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Numerical Simulation of Compressive Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Lattice-Reinforced Cement-Based Composites Based on ABAQUS.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the sound insulation capacity of small panels made of polymeric materials by 3D printing, a Taguchi L18-type factorial experiment with eight independent variables was designed and materialized. The independent variables were the panel thickness, polymer material type, 3D printing speed, infill percent, infill pattern, layer thickness, frequency, and sound volume. Empirical mathematical models were determined through the mathematical processing of the experimental results using specialized software. These empirical mathematical models highlight the meaning and intensity of the influence exerted by the input factors in the process on the acoustic pressure level of the energy absorbed after the passage of sounds through the small panels manufactured by 3D printing from polylactic acid and polyethylene terephthalate glycol. The factor with the strongest influence was the frequency of the sounds, with a maximum of the sound pressure level for a frequency of 13,000 Hz. A polylactic acid panel between the sound source and the sound-receiving sensor reduces the sound pressure level by about 45% from 95.8 to 65.8 dB. The power function type mathematical model in the case of the energy absorbed by the panel highlights the fact that the highest values of the exponents are those attached to the sound frequency (exponent equal to 1.616) and, respectively, to the thickness of the panel (exponent equal to -0.121).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.