ArticleCancers2024
Outlook for 615 Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients: Recurrence Risk after Surgery and Disease-Specific Survival in Advanced Disease.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuroendocrine Tumors Have Outgrown the Orphan-Disease Framework: Building an Evidence Base for a Changing Field.Cancers · 2026Article
- Clinical Value of a 51-Neuroendocrine Tumor-Specific Gene Signature (NETest 2.0) for Management of Pancreatic and Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Study in a Consecutive Cohort of 82 Patients Considered for Surgery.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2026Article
- Subcentimeter Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumor Resection for Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding Followed by Pacemaker-Treated Sick Sinus Syndrome: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
- Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors of Lung: A Case Series Supporting the IARC/WHO Common Classification of Neuroendocrine Tumor Nomenclature and Grading.Endocrine pathology · 2026Article
- Responses to medical treatment in patients with metastatic unresectable small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors - A single center study of 378 patients.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Clinical application of digital pathology in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours: proposal of a new G0 category.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2026Article
- Clinical application of targeted α-emitter therapy in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.Journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Prognosis of NETs: Has There Been Improvement over the Last 30 Years?Neuroendocrinology · 2025Review
- Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: epidemiology, genetics, and treatment.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (siNET) are one of the most common neuroendocrine neoplasms. Radical surgery is the only curative treatment.
methodWe utilized a single-center study including consecutive patients diagnosed from 2000 to 2020 and followed them until death or the end of study. Disease-specific survival and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were investigated by Cox regression analyses with the inclusion of prognostic factors. Aims/primary outcomes: We identified three groups: (1) disease specific-survival in the total cohort (group1), (2) RFS and disease-specific survival after intended radical surgery (group2), (3) disease specific-survival in patients with unresectable disease or residual tumor after primary resection (group3).
resultsIn total, 615 patients, with a mean age (SD) 65 ± 11 years were included. Median (IQR) Ki-67 index was 4 (2-7)%. Median disease-specific survival in group1 was 130 months. Median RFS in group2 was 138 months with 5- and 10-year RFS rates of 72% and 59% with age, plasma chromogranin A (p-CgA) and Ki-67 index as prognostic factors. The ten year disease-specific survival rate in group2 was 86%. The median disease-specific survival in group3 was 85 months with age, Ki-67 index, p-CgA and primary tumor resection as prognostic factors. When proliferation was expressed by WHO grade, no difference was observed between G1 vs. G2 for any of the primary outcomes.
conclusionsRecurrence rates remained high 5-10 years after surgery (group2) supporting long-term follow-up. Median disease-specific survival in patient with unresectable disease (group3) was 7 years, with a favorable impact of primary tumor resection. Our data does not support the current grading system since no significant prognostic information was detected in G1 vs. G2 tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.