Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201589›Full record

ArticleCancers2023

Relapsed Ovarian Cancer Patients with Ascites and/or Pleural Effusion Still Benefit from Treatment: A Real-Life Study.

Mariana Rebordão-Pires, Marta F Estrada, António Gomes, Filipa Silva, Carlota Baptista, Maria João Ramos, Ana Fortuna, Pedro Simões, Gabriela Sousa, Ana Marreiros and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mariana Rebordão-PiresMedical Oncology Unit, Instituto Português De Oncologia De Coimbra Francisco Gentil, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0923-2356
Marta F EstradaCancer Development and Innate Immune Evasion Laboratory, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5119-822X
António GomesSurgery Unit, Hospital Vila Franca de Xira, 2600-153 Vila Franca de Xira, Portugal.
Filipa SilvaGynecology Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisboa, Portugal.
Carlota BaptistaMedical Oncology Unit, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, 2674-514 Loures, Portugal.
Maria João RamosMedical Oncology Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-1021
Ana FortunaMedical Oncology Unit, Centro Hospitalar do Algarve, 8500-338 Portimão, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5368-2410
Pedro SimõesMedical Oncology Unit, Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, 2674-514 Loures, Portugal.
Gabriela SousaMedical Oncology Unit, Instituto Português De Oncologia De Coimbra Francisco Gentil, 3000-075 Coimbra, Portugal.
Ana MarreirosFaculty of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9410-4772
Rita FiorCancer Development and Innate Immune Evasion Laboratory, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038 Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-5550-2428

Funding

Champalimaud Foundation P168Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PTDC/BTM-SAL/3796/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Relapsed HGSOC with ascites and/or pleural effusion is a poor-prognostic population and poorly represented in clinical studies. We questioned if these patients are worth treating. In other words, if these patients received the most effective treatment, would it change the course of this disease? To our knowledge this is the first real-life study to evaluate this question in this low-survival population. (2) Methods: To tackle this question we performed a retrospective, multi-centric, real-life study, that reviewed relapsed HGSOC patients with ascites and/or pleural effusion. Our rationale was to compare the OS of two groups of patients: responders, i.e., patients who had an imagological response to treatment (complete/partial response/stable disease, RECIST criteria) versus non-responders (no response/progression upon treatment). We evaluated the predictive value of clinical variables that are available in a real-life setting (e.g., staging, chemotherapy, surgery, platinum-sensitivity). Multivariate logistic regression and survival analysis was conducted. A two-step cluster analysis SPSS tool was used for subgroup analysis. Platinum sensitivity/resistance was also analyzed, as well as multivariate and cluster analysis. (3) Results: We included 57 patients, 41.4% first line responders and 59.6% non-responders. The median OS of responders was 23 months versus 8 months in non-responders (

Indexed as

ascitesoverall survivalpleural effusionrelapsed ovarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID38201589
PMCPMC10778384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.