ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Hereditary Thoracic Aortic Diseases.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heritable Thoracic Aortic Diseases in Pediatric Practice: From Molecular Mechanisms to Genotype-Informed Management, a Comprehensive Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Clinical Management of Aortic Aneurysms: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Extended Root and Arch Replacement for Filamin A-Related Aortopathy With Severe Aortic Regurgitation.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics Analysis of Ferroptosis-Related Driver Genes in Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Thoracic aortic disease in young patients: from genetics to management.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Genetic factors and management strategies in aortic health: a literature review of inherited aortopathy.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in both imaging techniques and genetics have led to the recognition of a wide variety of aortic anomalies that can be grouped under the term 'hereditary thoracic aortic diseases'. The present review aims to summarize this very heterogeneous population's clinical, genetic, and imaging characteristics and to discuss the implications of the diagnosis for clinical counselling (on sports activity or pregnancy), medical therapies and surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.