Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201396›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Optimizing the Clinical Use of High-Sensitivity Troponin Assays: A Review.

Dipti Tiwari, Tar Choon Aw

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dipti TiwariIndependent Researcher, Singapore 069046, Singapore.
Tar Choon AwDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore 529889, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7814-8836
National University of Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic heart diseases (IHDs) remain a global health concern. Many IHD cases go undiagnosed due to challenges in the initial diagnostic process, particularly in cases of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays have revolutionized myocardial injury assessment, but variations in diagnostic cut-off values and population differences have raised challenges. This review addresses essential laboratory and clinical considerations for hs-cTn assays. Laboratory guidelines discuss the importance of establishing standardized 99th-percentile upper reference limits (URLs) considering factors such as age, sex, health status, and analytical precision. The reference population should exclude individuals with comorbidities like diabetes and renal disease, and rigorous selection is crucial. Some clinical guidelines emphasize the significance of sex-specific URL limits while others do not. They highlight the use of serial troponin assays for AMI diagnosis. In addition, timely reporting of accurate hs-cTn results is essential for effective clinical use. This review aims to provide a clearer understanding among laboratory professionals and clinicians on how to optimize the use of hs-cTn assays in clinical settings in order to ensure accurate AMI diagnosis and thus improve patient care and outcomes.

Indexed as

acute myocardial infarctioncardiac biomarkershigh-sensitivity cardiac troponinsserial troponin testing

Identifiers

PMID38201396
PMCPMC10795745
OpenAlexW4390466038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.