Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201370›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Machine Learning Algorithm: Texture Analysis in CNO and Application in Distinguishing CNO and Bone Marrow Growth-Related Changes on Whole-Body MRI.

Marta Forestieri, Antonio Napolitano, Paolo Tomà, Stefano Bascetta, Marco Cirillo, Emanuela Tagliente, Donatella Fracassi, Paola D'Angelo, Ines Casazza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Detecting Distant Metastases in Prostate Cancer Using Whole-body MR Imaging Together with DWIBS (Diffusion-weighted Imaging with Background Body Signal Suppression).Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta ForestieriImaging Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Antonio NapolitanoMedical Physics Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Paolo TomàImaging Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0158-4760
Stefano BascettaImaging Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Marco CirilloImaging Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Emanuela TaglienteMedical Physics Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Donatella FracassiMedical Physics Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2021-0972
Paola D'AngeloImaging Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Ines CasazzaImaging Department, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, Italy.
Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to analyze the texture characteristics of chronic non-bacterial osteomyelitis (CNO) bone lesions, identified as areas of altered signal intensity on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences, and to distinguish them from bone marrow growth-related changes through Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe included a group of 66 patients with confirmed diagnosis of CNO and a group of 28 patients with suspected extra-skeletal systemic disease. All examinations were performed on a 1.5 T MRI scanner. Using the opensource 3D Slicer software version 4.10.2, the ROIs on CNO lesions and on the red bone marrow were sampled. Texture analysis (TA) was carried out using Pyradiomics. We applied an optimization search grid algorithm on nine classic ML classifiers and a Deep Learning (DL) Neural Network (NN). The model's performance was evaluated using Accuracy (ACC), AUC-ROC curves, F1-score, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), Mean Absolute Error (MAE) and Root-Mean-Square Error (RMSE). Furthermore, we used Shapley additive explanations to gain insight into the behavior of the prediction model.

resultsMost predictive characteristics were selected by Boruta algorithm for each combination of ROI sequences for the characterization and classification of the two types of signal hyperintensity. The overall best classification result was obtained by the NN with ACC = 0.91, AUC = 0.93 with 95% CI 0.91-0.94, F1-score = 0.94 and PPV = 93.8%. Between classic ML methods, ensemble learners showed high model performance; specifically, the best-performing classifier was the Stack (ST) with ACC = 0.85, AUC = 0.81 with 95% CI 0.8-0.84, F1-score = 0.9, PPV = 90%.

conclusionsOur results show the potential of ML methods in discerning edema-like lesions, in particular by distinguishing CNO lesions from hematopoietic bone marrow changes in a pediatric population. The Neural Network showed the overall best results, while a Stacking classifier, based on Gradient Boosting and Random Forest as principal estimators and Logistic Regressor as final estimator, achieved the best results between the other ML methods.

Indexed as

bone marrowchildrenchronic non-bacterial osteomyelitismachine learningtexture analysiswhole-body magnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID38201370
PMCPMC10804385
OpenAlexW4390272524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.