Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201350›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Cross-Silo, Privacy-Preserving, and Lightweight Federated Multimodal System for the Identification of Major Depressive Disorder Using Audio and Electroencephalogram.

Chetna Gupta, Vikas Khullar, Nitin Goyal, Kirti Saini, Ritu Baniwal, Sushil Kumar, Rashi Rastogi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chetna GuptaChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140417, Punjab, India.
Vikas KhullarChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura 140417, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0404-3652
Nitin GoyalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh 123031, Haryana, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7878-363X
Kirti SainiDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra 136119, Haryana, India.
Ritu BaniwalDepartment of Computer Science, Jyotiba Phule Government College, Radaur, Yamunanagar 135133, Haryana, India.
Sushil KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, Central University of Haryana, Mahendergarh 123031, Haryana, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4470-614X
Rashi RastogiDepartment of Computer Applications, Sir Chottu Ram Institute of Engineering & Technology, Ch. Charan Singh University, Meerut 250001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Central University of Haryana · INChitkara University · INChaudhary Charan Singh University · INKurukshetra University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this day and age, depression is still one of the biggest problems in the world. If left untreated, it can lead to suicidal thoughts and attempts. There is a need for proper diagnoses of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and evaluation of the early stages to stop the side effects. Early detection is critical to identify a variety of serious conditions. In order to provide safe and effective protection to MDD patients, it is crucial to automate diagnoses and make decision-making tools widely available. Although there are various classification systems for the diagnosis of MDD, no reliable, secure method that meets these requirements has been established to date. In this paper, a federated deep learning-based multimodal system for MDD classification using electroencephalography (EEG) and audio datasets is presented while meeting data privacy requirements. The performance of the federated learning (FL) model was tested on independent and identically distributed (IID) and non-IID data. The study began by extracting features from several pre-trained models and ultimately decided to use bidirectional short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) as the base model, as it had the highest validation accuracy of 91% compared to a convolutional neural network and LSTM with 85% and 89% validation accuracy on audio data, respectively. The Bi-LSTM model also achieved a validation accuracy of 98.9% for EEG data. The FL method was then used to perform experiments on IID and non-IID datasets. The FL-based multimodal model achieved an exceptional training and validation accuracy of 99.9% when trained and evaluated on both IID and non-IIID datasets. These results show that the FL multimodal system performs almost as well as the Bi-LSTM multimodal system and emphasize its suitability for processing IID and non-IIID data. Several clients were found to perform better than conventional pre-trained models in a multimodal framework for federated learning using EEG and audio datasets. The proposed framework stands out from other classification techniques for MDD due to its special features, such as multimodality and data privacy for edge machines with limited resources. Due to these additional features, the framework concept is the most suitable alternative approach for the early classification of MDD patients.

Indexed as

audioBi-LSTMdeep learningelectroencephalographyfederated learningIIDsmajor depressive disordernon-IIDs

Identifiers

PMID38201350
PMCPMC10795654
OpenAlexW4390196672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.