Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201320›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Deep Learning Model Based on You Only Look Once Algorithm for Detection and Visualization of Fracture Areas in Three-Dimensional Skeletal Images.

Young-Dae Jeon, Min-Jun Kang, Sung-Uk Kuh, Ha-Yeong Cha, Moo-Sub Kim, Ju-Yeon You, Hyeon-Joo Kim, Seung-Han Shin, Yang-Guk Chung, Do-Kun Yoon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Integrating blockchain technology with artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of tibial plateau fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Model Quality in AI-based Bruise Detection: Rethinking IoU and Confidence Thresholds.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Young-Dae JeonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan 44033, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4862-9679
Min-Jun KangDepartment of Integrative Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University of Korea, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Uk KuhDepartment of Integrative Medicine, College of Medicine, Yonsei University of Korea, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea.
Ha-Yeong ChaIndustrial R&D Center, KAVILAB Co., Ltd., Seoul 06675, Republic of Korea.
Moo-Sub KimIndustrial R&D Center, KAVILAB Co., Ltd., Seoul 06675, Republic of Korea.
Ju-Yeon YouIndustrial R&D Center, KAVILAB Co., Ltd., Seoul 06675, Republic of Korea.
Hyeon-Joo KimIndustrial R&D Center, KAVILAB Co., Ltd., Seoul 06675, Republic of Korea.
Seung-Han ShinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2533-3293
Yang-Guk ChungDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea.
Do-Kun YoonIndustrial R&D Center, KAVILAB Co., Ltd., Seoul 06675, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-235X

Funding

Seoul Business Agency CY220040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utilizing "You only look once" (YOLO) v4 AI offers valuable support in fracture detection and diagnostic decision-making. The purpose of this study was to help doctors to detect and diagnose fractures more accurately and intuitively, with fewer errors. The data accepted into the backbone are diversified through CSPDarkNet-53. Feature maps are extracted using Spatial Pyramid Pooling and a Path Aggregation Network in the neck part. The head part aggregates and generates the final output. All bounding boxes by the YOLO v4 are mapped onto the 3D reconstructed bone images after being resized to match the same region as shown in the 2D CT images. The YOLO v4-based AI model was evaluated through precision-recall (PR) curves and the intersection over union (IoU). Our proposed system facilitated an intuitive display of the fractured area through a distinctive red mask overlaid on the 3D reconstructed bone images. The high average precision values (>0.60) were reported as 0.71 and 0.81 from the PR curves of the tibia and elbow, respectively. The IoU values were calculated as 0.6327 (tibia) and 0.6638 (elbow). When utilized by orthopedic surgeons in real clinical scenarios, this AI-powered 3D diagnosis support system could enable a quick and accurate trauma diagnosis.

Indexed as

deep learningfracture detectionthree dimensional (3D) reconstructed imagetibia and elbowYOLO v4

Identifiers

PMID38201320
PMCPMC10802847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.