Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201207›Full record

ReviewCells2023

A Comprehensive Review of the Potential Role of Liquid Biopsy as a Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Biomarker in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Kosta Stosic, Oier Azurmendi Senar, Jawad Tarfouss, Christelle Bouchart, Julie Navez, Jean-Luc Van Laethem, Tatjana Arsenijevic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. The Need for a Systems Biology Approach in Cancer Explained.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kosta StosicLaboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Oier Azurmendi SenarLaboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Jawad TarfoussLaboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Christelle BouchartLaboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Julie NavezLaboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5362-8764
Jean-Luc Van LaethemLaboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Tatjana ArsenijevicLaboratory of Experimental Gastroenterology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1070 Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

Fund for Scientific Research 48963Fund for Scientific Research J.0180.21F
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the most lethal malignant diseases, with a mortality rate being close to incidence. Due to its heterogeneity and plasticity, as well as the lack of distinct symptoms in the early phases, it is very often diagnosed at an advanced stage, resulting in poor prognosis. Traditional tissue biopsies remain the gold standard for making a diagnosis, but have an obvious disadvantage in their inapplicability for frequent sampling. Blood-based biopsies represent a non-invasive method which potentially offers easy and repeated sampling, leading to the early detection and real-time monitoring of the disease and hopefully an accurate prognosis. Given the urgent need for a reliable biomarker that can estimate a patient's condition and response to an assigned treatment, blood-based biopsies are emerging as a potential new tool for improving patients' survival and surveillance. In this article, we discuss the current advances and challenges in using liquid biopsies for pancreatic cancer, focusing on circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA), extracellular vesicles (EVs), and circulating tumour cells (CTCs), and compare the performance and reliability of different biomarkers and combinations of biomarkers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsBiomarkersHumansLiquid BiopsyPrognosisReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersliquid biopsypancreatic cancertumoural heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID38201207
PMCPMC10778087
OpenAlexW4389938226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.