Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201025›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Mid-Term Results of an Italian Multicentric Experience with the Roadsaver

Olga Silvestri, Giulio Accarino, Davide Turchino, Francesco Squizzato, Michele Piazza, Martina Bastianon, Sara Di Gregorio, Giovanni Pratesi, Michele Antonello, Davide Costa and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Olga SilvestriDepartment of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-0195-9023
Giulio AccarinoDepartment of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0480-907X
Davide TurchinoDepartment of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2866-0062
Francesco SquizzatoDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, School of Medicine, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9327-2934
Michele PiazzaDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, School of Medicine, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy.
Martina BastianonVascular and Endovascular Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, 16100 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-8149-7656
Sara Di GregorioVascular and Endovascular Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, 16100 Genova, Italy.
Giovanni PratesiVascular and Endovascular Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, 16100 Genova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0174-3757
Michele AntonelloDepartment of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences and Public Health, School of Medicine, Padua University Hospital, 35100 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1029-8878
Davide CostaInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology (CIFL), International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-8755
Raffaele SerraInteruniversity Center of Phlebolymphology (CIFL), International Research and Educational Program in Clinical and Experimental Biotechnology, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4477-7412
Umberto Marcello BracaleDepartment of Public Health, Vascular Surgery Unit, University Federico II of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-9791
Federico II University Hospital · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Padua · ITMagna Graecia University · ITUniversity of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarotid artery stenting (CAS) using first-generation single-layer stents is widely accepted as a good alternative to standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA) but it is associated with worse outcomes in terms of both plaque prolapse and cerebral embolization.

aimTo evaluate the perioperative and midterm outcomes of CAS using the new-generation Roadsaver

methodsHerein, we present the results of an observational, retrospective, multicentric study on non-consecutive patients who underwent the CAS procedure between January 2017 and December 2022 at three Italian, high-volume vascular surgery centers. The inclusion criteria were the patients' eligibility for the CAS procedure in accordance with the current Italian guidelines, and the implantation of a Roadsaver stent. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were included in the study. The patients requiring reintervention for carotid restenosis following CEA were also included. Perioperative data regarding procedural success was defined as the successful implantation of the device in the desired position, less than 30% residual stenosis, and the absence of intraoperative neurological complications. The primary outcome was any adverse cerebrovascular event such as stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) during the procedure and/or after discharge. The secondary outcomes were the need for further intervention, and all-cause death following procedure.

resultsThree-hundred-fifty-three (353) patients were included in our study; the mean age was 74.3 years. A total of 5.9% of the patients were symptomatic on their operated side, while 7.3% had contralateral carotid occlusion. A cerebral embolic protection device (CPD) was employed in all patients. A total of 13.3% of the patients were operated on for restenosis after CEA Technical success was achieved in 96.9% of the cases with an intraoperative report of six TIAs (1.7%) and six ipsilateral strokes (1.7%). The mean hospital stay was 1.8 days. The thirty-day follow up showed one TIA and one more stroke. At the mean 35-month follow-up time, the primary outcome was present in six patients (1.7%), where four TIAs (1.1%) and two strokes (0.5%) were reported. Restenosis occurred in five patients (1.4%). Death for any cause was reported in 11 patients (3.1%).

conclusionsAs most recent, high-quality studies show, the CAS procedure with second-generation devices such as the Roadsaver stent is safe and effective in preventing carotid-related cerebrovascular events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. The intraoperative and postoperative cerebrovascular complication rate in high volume centers is very low, ensuring confidence in its employment for the CAS procedure along with a CPD as a valid alternative to CEA.

Indexed as

carotid artery stenosiscarotid artery stentingdual-layer stentmicromeshstroke

Identifiers

PMID38201025
PMCPMC10778716
OpenAlexW4390580992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.