Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38201017›Full record

ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Evidence-Based Implementation of the Family-Centered Model and the Use of Tele-Intervention in Early Childhood Services: A Systematic Review.

Estibaliz Jimenez-Arberas, Yara Casais-Suarez, Alba Fernandez-Mendez, Sara Menendez-Espina, Sergio Rodriguez-Menendez, Jose Antonio Llosa, Jose Antonio Prieto-Saborit

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Estibaliz Jimenez-ArberasUniversity Clinic INYPEMA, Faculty Padre Osso, University of Oviedo, 33008 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-580X
Yara Casais-SuarezUniversity Clinic INYPEMA, Faculty Padre Osso, University of Oviedo, 33008 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2483-6913
Alba Fernandez-MendezUniversity Clinic INYPEMA, Faculty Padre Osso, University of Oviedo, 33008 Oviedo, Spain.
Sara Menendez-EspinaUniversity Clinic INYPEMA, Faculty Padre Osso, University of Oviedo, 33008 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4238-4693
Sergio Rodriguez-MenendezUniversity Clinic INYPEMA, Faculty Padre Osso, University of Oviedo, 33008 Oviedo, Spain.
Jose Antonio LlosaUniversity Clinic INYPEMA, Faculty Padre Osso, University of Oviedo, 33008 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2644-020X
Jose Antonio Prieto-SaboritUniversity Clinic INYPEMA, Faculty Padre Osso, University of Oviedo, 33008 Oviedo, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1135-523X

Funding

Gobierno del Principado de Asturias INYPEMA Living Lab
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this review is to explore the evidence and efficacy of two trends in early childhood intervention services: the family-centered model and the use of tele-intervention.

methodsA systematic review was carried out following the PRISMA methodology and using three databases: Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus. The studies included were those aimed at children from 0 to 6 years of age, focused on early intervention, and which alluded to the family-centered model and/or tele-intervention.

resultsa total of 33 studies were included. Five main themes were identified: (1) The participation of children and family is facilitated and improved by the family-centered model of care; (2) the feeling of competence, self-efficacy, satisfaction and empowerment in professionals and families have a positive impact on quality of life; (3) the use of tele-intervention as a tool for prevention and intervention; (4) preparation for telepractice can improve the development of commitment; (5) tele-intervention as a possible solution to contextual barriers.

conclusionsTele-intervention in pediatrics is presented as a tool inherent to the family-centered model since its implementation involves several common strategies. Future lines of research should explore the use of this tool as a possible solution to contextual barriers.

Indexed as

childhoodearly interventionfamily-centered caresystematic reviewtelepractice

Identifiers

PMID38201017
PMCPMC10779073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.