ArticleJournal of anatomy2024
Population trends in human rib cross-sectional shapes.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multicenter Cohort Study of 3805 RibXcar Cases: Safety and Efficacy in Incisionless Rib Remodeling.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- RibXcar with Dots Point Technique: The Science of Fracture as a Safety Principle.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Mineralized area of the human rib cross-sections from early puberty until adulthood.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026Article
- A statistical shape model of the human sternum including cortical bone thickness.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in Lumbar Segmental Bone Mineral Density and Age-Related Evolution of Whole-Body Bone Mineral Density: Comprehensive Implications for Osteoporosis Risk Assessment.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- AI-assisted radiologists vs. standard double reading for rib fracture detection on CT images: A real-world clinical study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Population trends in human rib cross-sectional shapes.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rib fractures remain the most frequent thoracic injury in motor vehicle crashes. Computational human body models (HBMs) can be used to simulate these injuries and design mitigation strategies, but they require adequately detailed geometry to replicate such fractures. Due to a lack of rib cross-sectional shape data availability, most commercial HBMs use highly simplified rib sections extracted from a single individual during original HBM development. This study provides human rib shape data collected from chest CT scans of 240 females and males across the full adult age range. A cortical bone mapping algorithm extracted cross-sectional geometry from scans in terms of local periosteal position with respect to the central rib axis and local cortex thickness. Principal component analysis was used to reduce the dimensionality of these cross-sectional shape data. Linear regression found significant associations between principal component scores and subject demographics (sex, age, height, and weight) at all rib levels, and predicted scores were used to explore the expected rib cross-sectional shapes across a wide range of subject demographics. The resulting detailed rib cross-sectional shapes were quantified in terms of their total cross-sectional area and their cortical bone cross-sectional area. Average-sized female ribs were smaller in total cross-sectional area than average-sized male ribs by between 20% and 36% across the rib cage, with the greatest differences seen in the central portions of rib 6. This trend persisted although to smaller differences of 14%-29% when comparing females and males of equal intermediate weight and stature. Cortical bone cross-sectional areas were up to 18% smaller in females than males of equivalent height and weight but also reached parity in certain regions of the rib cage. Increased age from 25 to 80 years was associated with reductions in cortical bone cross-sectional area (up to 37% in females and 26% in males at mid-rib levels). Total cross-sectional area was also seen to reduce with age in females but to a lesser degree (of up to 17% in mid-rib regions). Similar regions saw marginal increases in total cross-sectional area for male ribs, indicating age affects rib cortex thickness moreso than overall rib cross-sectional size. Increased subject height was associated with increased rib total and cortical bone cross-sectional areas by approximately 25% and 15% increases, respectively, in mid-rib sections for a given 30 cm increase in height, although the magnitudes of these associations varied by sex and rib location. Increased weight was associated with approximately equal changes in both cortical bone and total cross-sectional areas in males. These effects were most prominent (around 25% increases for an addition of 50 kg) toward lower ribs in the rib cage and had only modest effects (less than 12% change) in ribs 2-4. Females saw greater increases with weight in total rib area compared to cortical bone area, of up to 21% at the eighth rib level. Results from this study show the expected shapes of rib cross-sections across the adult rib cage and across a broad range of demographics. This detailed geometry can be used to produce accurate rib models representing widely varying populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.