Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200539›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Commercial provider staff experiences of the NHS low calorie diet programme pilot: a qualitative exploration of key barriers and facilitators.

Susan Jones, Tamara J Brown, Patricia Watson, Catherine Homer, Charlotte Freeman, Chirag Bakhai, Louisa Ells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Susan JonesSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Centuria Building, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, TS1 3BX, UK.
Tamara J BrownObesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QW, UK. tamara.brown@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-7098
Patricia WatsonSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Centuria Building, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, TS1 3BX, UK.
Catherine HomerSport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Olympic Legacy Park, 2 Old Hall Road, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK.
Charlotte FreemanPublic Health Team, Calderdale Council, Princess Buildings, Princess Street, Halifax, West Yorkshire, HX1 1TP, UK.
Chirag BakhaiLarkside Practice, Churchfield Medical Centre, 322 Crawley Green Road, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 9SB, UK.
Louisa EllsObesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QW, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research,Health Services and Delivery Research NIHR132075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Health Service Type 2 Diabetes Path to Remission programme in England (known as the NHS Low Calorie Diet programme when piloted) was established to support people living with excess weight and Type 2 Diabetes to lose weight and improve their glycaemic control. A mixed method evaluation was commissioned to provide an enhanced understanding of the long-term cost effectiveness of the pilot programme, its implementation, equity and transferability across broad and diverse populations. This study provided key insights on implementation and equity from the service providers' perspective.

methodsThirteen focus groups were conducted with commercial providers of the programme, during the initial pilot rollout. Participants were purposively sampled across all provider organisations and staff roles involved in implementing and delivering the programme. Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) was used to design the topic schedule, with the addition of topics on equity and person-centredness. Data were thematically analysed using NPT constructs with additional inductively created codes. Codes were summarised, and analytical themes generated.

resultsThe programme was found to fulfil the requirements for normalisation from the providers' perspective. However, barriers were identified in engaging GP practices and receiving sufficient referrals, as well as supporting service users through challenges to remain compliant. There was variation in communication and training between provider sites. Areas for learning and improvement included adapting systems and processes and closing the gap where needs of service users are not fully met.

conclusionsThe evaluation of the pilot programme demonstrated that it was workable when supported by effective primary care engagement, comprehensive training, and effective internal and external communication. However, limitations were identified in relation to programme specifications e.g. eligibility criteria, service specification and local commissioning decisions e.g. pattern of roll out, incentivisation of general practice. A person-centred approach to care is fundamental and should include cultural adaptation(s), and the assessment and signposting to additional support and services where required.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2CommunicationEligibility DeterminationHumansState MedicineDelivery of health careDiabetesDietNormalisation process theoryObesityRe:Mission

Identifiers

PMID38200539
PMCPMC10782528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.