Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200528›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Adjusting advance care planning to older people's needs: results from focus groups and interviews.

Heike Gerger, Anneke van Dijk-de Vries, Albine Moser, Inge Jochem, Marja Veenstra, Marieke Perry, Marloes van Bokhoven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Advance Care Planning in German General Practice: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study on Patients' Expectations and Experiences.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heike GergerDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands. heike.gerger@gmail.com.
Anneke van Dijk-de VriesDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Albine MoserDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Inge JochemMCC Omnes, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Marja VeenstraBurgerkracht Limburg, Sittard, the Netherlands.
Marieke PerryDepartment of Primary Care Medicine and Geriatrics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marloes van BokhovenDepartment of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

Zorginstituut Nederland 2021012945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is becoming increasingly important in medical care. Some suggest standardized approaches to initiate ACP with all older adults. However, the idea of patient-centered care suggests more nuanced approaches tailored to individual older adults' needs. This study investigated how older adults with different views and needs about ACP can be approached in an adequate and most beneficial way by health care professionals.

methodsWe used questionnaires, interviews, focus groups and informal conversations with older adults, living in their own homes, who volunteered to take part in our research. The research was participatory as we collaborated closely with practice partners and we used the obtained findings immediately and continuously to inform the next steps of our research throughout the process.

resultsWe identified three subgroups of older adults with differential needs regarding ACP-related activities: The first group avoids talking about their needs and wishes for care towards the end of life. These older people benefit from activities, which aim at motivating them to concern themselves with ACP-related topics. The second group consists of older adults who are in principle open for ACP-conversations but do not initiate these themselves. This group either trusts their next-of-kin or their healthcare professional to act in accordance with their wishes or does not bring up the topic in order to avoid confronting relevant others with possibly unpleasant topics. This group of people benefits from information about ACP and from healthcare professionals initiating the ACP process. The third group of older people initiates the ACP process themselves, gathers information, and takes the necessary steps for ACP. With this group it remains relevant to check carefully whether they have indeed taken all relevant steps and shared the information with all relevant involved care institutions and relatives.

conclusionsWe propose a model to simplify adjustments of ACP to individuals' needs. Our suggested approach might contribute to increasing the motivation of older people to engage in ACP conversations if these are more closely related to their own needs. Further, it might also contribute to simplifying the individual shaping of the ACP process for healthcare professionals as our suggested model offers clear guidance for approaching different types of older people in different ways. The suggested approach may in future be used for training health care professionals in the conduct of ACP conversations.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningAgedCommunicationDeathFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHumansACPAdvance care planningMixed-methodsParticipatory researchPersonalized care

Identifiers

PMID38200528
PMCPMC10782636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.