ArticleBMC oral health2024
A comparative evaluation of physical properties of CAD/CAM complete denture resins- an in vitro study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- CAD-CAM vs. conventional denture bases: a systematic review with network meta-analysis ofFrontiers in dental medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Enhancing Wear Resistance and Surface Hardness of Three-Dimensionally Printed Denture Teeth Through Post-Treatment Under Elevated Temperature and Pressure.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- BLIS M18 probiotic cleanser: effects on color and surface properties of conventional, milled, and 3D-printed PMMA.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Mechanical Performance of CAD/CAM-Milled Versus 3D-Printed Resins for Prosthetic Applications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Polymers · 2026Review
- A comparative evaluation of the flexural strength and surface hardness of CAD/CAM fabricated and conventional denture bases.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- A combined in-silico and in-vitro evaluation of cyanoacrylate-based dental materials as an adhesive for applications in prosthodontics: molecular docking and cytocompatibility analysis.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Article
- Effects of high temperature with pressure polymerization on the physical and mechanical properties and dimensional changes of 3D-printed denture teeth resin.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Systematic review and meta analysis of mechanical properties of 3D printed denture bases compared to milled and conventional materials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluation of mechanical properties and color stability of 3D-printed denture base materials following two surface treatments.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparative in vitro study on wear resistance and colour stability of 3D-printed, milled, and conventional PMMA denture teeth.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Validation of a New Questionnaire for Assessing the Psychosocial Impact of Gingival Aesthetics (PIGAQ).Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
- Surface roughness on retention of complete dentures using conventional and digital techniques: An in vitro study.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- In Vitro Analysis of Bonding and Wear Properties of 3D Printed Denture Tooth Materials.Cureus · 2024Article
- In-vitro evaluation of shear bond strength and bond-failure of isoamyl cyanoacrylate-resin adhesive ratios for bonding 3D-Printed denture bases and teeth.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn dentistry, there is a growing preference for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems over traditional laboratory procedures. However, there is not much literature comparing various CAD/CAM materials. Thus, this study aimed to assess and compare the color stability and hardness of gingival and tooth colored milled and 3D-printed acrylic resins. MATERIALS AND
methodsFour types of CAD/CAM materials were prepared: 3D-printed pink shade (PP), milled polymenthymethacrylate (PMMA) pink shade (MP), 3D-printed tooth shade (PT) and milled PMMA tooth shade (MT) (n = 6). For hardness, disc shaped samples of 15 mm × 2 mm and for color stability, bar shaped samples of 65mmx10mmx2.5 mm were prepared and polished. Vickers hardness test was performed in a microhardness tester. Color stability test was done by immersing in coffee solution and coca cola for 7 days. Day 0 and day 7 measurements were recorded using a digital spectrophotometer and the change in color was calculated. For statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc tests were done.
resultsFor color stability, milled PMMA was superior to 3D-printed resin samples. Milled pink and tooth shade samples had similar color stability, whereas 3D-printed tooth shade samples were more color stable as compared to pink shade 3D-printed samples. For hardness, milled tooth shade PMMA was the most superior one, followed by 3D-printed tooth shade, whereas pink shade milled PMMA and 3D-printed resin samples had similar hardness values and were inferior to the tooth shade CAD/CAM materials.
conclusionColor stability of milled PMMA is superior to that of 3D-printed resins. Hardness of tooth shade milled and 3D-printed resins is more than that of pink shade milled and 3D-printed resins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.