Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200463›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Normalisation and equity of referral to the NHS Low Calorie Diet programme pilot; a qualitative evaluation of the experiences of health care staff.

Kevin J Drew, Catherine Homer, Duncan Radley, Susan Jones, Charlotte Freeman, Chirag Bakhai, Louisa Ells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin J DrewObesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QW, UK. k.drew@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0149-2521
Catherine HomerSport and Physical Activity Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Olympic Legacy Park, 2 Old Hall Road, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK.
Duncan RadleyObesity Institute, School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Headingley Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QW, UK.
Susan JonesSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, Tees Valley, TS1 3BX, UK.
Charlotte FreemanPublic Health Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council, Halifax, HX1 1TS, UK.
Chirag BakhaiLarkside Practice, Churchfield Medical Centre, 322 Crawley Green Road, Luton, Bedfordshire, LU2 9SB, UK.
Louisa EllsObesity Institute, School of Health, Leeds Beckett University, City Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QW, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health Research, Health Services and Delivery Research NIHR 132075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth and wellbeing can be profoundly impacted by both obesity and type 2 diabetes, while the normalisation and equity of care for people living with these non-communicable diseases remain as challenges for local health systems. The National Health Service Low Calorie Diet programme in England, aims to support people to achieve type 2 diabetes remission, while also reducing health inequalities. We have explored the experiences of health care staff who have made a referral to the LCD programme, while identifying effective and equitable delivery of programme referrals, and their normalisation into routine care.

methodsNineteen individual semi-structured interviews were completed health care staff in the first year of the Low Calorie Diet programme. Interviewees were purposively sampled from the ten localities who undertook the Low Calorie Diet programme pilot. Each interview explored a number of topics of interest including communication and training, referrals, equity, and demands on primary care, before being subjected to a thematic analysis.

resultsFrom the data, five core themes were identified: Covid-19 and the demands on primary care, the expertise and knowledge of referrers, patient identification and the referral process, barriers to referrals and who gets referred to the NHS LCD programme. Our findings demonstrate the variation in the real world settings of a national diabetes programme. It highlights the challenge of COVID-19 for health care staff, whereby the increased workload of referrals occurred at a time when capacity was curtailed. We have also identified several barriers to referral and have shown that referrals had not yet been normalised into routine care at the point of data collection. We also raise issues of equity in the referral process, as not all eligible people are informed about the programme.

conclusionsReferral generation had not yet been consistently normalised into routine care, yet our findings suggest that the LCD programme runs the risk of normalising an inequitable referral process. Inequalities remain a significant challenge, and the adoption of an equitable referral process, normalised at a service delivery level, has the capacity to contribute to the improvement of health inequalities.

Indexed as

COVID-19Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Caloric RestrictionHumansReferral and ConsultationState MedicineEquityInequalitiesLow calorie dietNormalisation process theoryObesityRe:Mission studyType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID38200463
PMCPMC10782747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.