Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200389›Full record

ReviewNatural products and bioprospecting2024

Precision enzyme discovery through targeted mining of metagenomic data.

Shohreh Ariaeenejad, Javad Gharechahi, Mehdi Foroozandeh Shahraki, Fereshteh Fallah Atanaki, Jian-Lin Han, Xue-Zhi Ding, Falk Hildebrand, Mohammad Bahram, Kaveh Kavousi, Ghasem Hosseini Salekdeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Natural products and bioprospecting, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Recombinant Production and Characterization of a Novel α-L-Fucosidase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Analysis of metagenomic data.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shohreh AriaeenejadDepartment of Systems and Synthetic Biology, Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (ABRII), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Javad GharechahiHuman Genetics Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi Foroozandeh ShahrakiLaboratory of Complex Biological Systems and Bioinformatics (CBB), Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics (IBB), University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Fereshteh Fallah AtanakiLaboratory of Complex Biological Systems and Bioinformatics (CBB), Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics (IBB), University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Jian-Lin HanLivestock Genetics Program, International Livestock Research, Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Xue-Zhi DingKey Laboratory of Yak Breeding Engineering, Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Lanzhou, 730050, China.
Falk HildebrandGut Microbes and Health, Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Mohammad BahramDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Ulls Väg 16, 756 51, Uppsala, Sweden.
Kaveh KavousiLaboratory of Complex Biological Systems and Bioinformatics (CBB), Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics (IBB), University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. kkavousi@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1906-3912
Ghasem Hosseini SalekdehFaculty of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. hsalekdeh@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5124-4721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomics has opened new avenues for exploring the genetic potential of uncultured microorganisms, which may serve as promising sources of enzymes and natural products for industrial applications. Identifying enzymes with improved catalytic properties from the vast amount of available metagenomic data poses a significant challenge that demands the development of novel computational and functional screening tools. The catalytic properties of all enzymes are primarily dictated by their structures, which are predominantly determined by their amino acid sequences. However, this aspect has not been fully considered in the enzyme bioprospecting processes. With the accumulating number of available enzyme sequences and the increasing demand for discovering novel biocatalysts, structural and functional modeling can be employed to identify potential enzymes with novel catalytic properties. Recent efforts to discover new polysaccharide-degrading enzymes from rumen metagenome data using homology-based searches and machine learning-based models have shown significant promise. Here, we will explore various computational approaches that can be employed to screen and shortlist metagenome-derived enzymes as potential biocatalyst candidates, in conjunction with the wet lab analytical methods traditionally used for enzyme characterization.

Indexed as

Enzyme bioprospectingFunctional-based screeningMetagenomicsNatural productsProtein structure predictionSequence-based screening

Identifiers

PMID38200389
PMCPMC10781932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.