Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200368›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2024

Dynamic evolutionary interplay between ontogenetic skull patterning and whole-head integration.

Joni Ollonen, Eraqi R Khannoon, Simone Macrì, Vladislav Vergilov, Jaakko Kuurne, Jarmo Saarikivi, Arttu Soukainen, Ida-Maria Aalto, Ingmar Werneburg, Raul E Diaz and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
22.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

Joni OllonenInstitute of Biotechnology, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4077-3289
Eraqi R KhannoonBiology Department, College of Science, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7257-9985
Simone MacrìInstitute of Biotechnology, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7436-258X
Vladislav VergilovNational Museum of Natural History, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7464-2263
Jaakko KuurneFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jarmo SaarikiviFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Arttu SoukainenFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Ida-Maria AaltoInstitute of Biotechnology, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1623-9694
Ingmar WerneburgSenckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment, Eberhard Karls Universität, Tübingen, Germany.
Raul E DiazDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9107-124X
Nicolas Di-PoïInstitute of Biotechnology, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. nicolas.di-poi@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3313-3016
University of Helsinki · FIBulgarian Academy of Sciences · BGCalifornia State University Los Angeles · USSenckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment · DETaibah University · SA

Funding

Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 321910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrangement and morphology of the vertebrate skull reflect functional and ecological demands, making it a highly adaptable structure. However, the fundamental developmental and macroevolutionary mechanisms leading to different vertebrate skull phenotypes remain unclear. Here we exploit the morphological diversity of squamate reptiles to assess the developmental and evolutionary patterns of skull variation and covariation in the whole head. Our geometric morphometric analysis of a complex squamate ontogenetic dataset (209 specimens, 169 embryos, 44 species), covering stages from craniofacial primordia to fully ossified bones, reveals that morphological differences between snake and lizard skulls arose gradually through changes in spatial relationships (heterotopy) followed by alterations in developmental timing or rate (heterochrony). Along with dynamic spatiotemporal changes in the integration pattern of skull bone shape and topology with surrounding brain tissues and sensory organs, we identify a relatively higher phenotypic integration of the developing snake head compared with lizards. The eye, nasal cavity and Jacobson's organ are pivotal in skull morphogenesis, highlighting the importance of sensory rearrangements in snake evolution. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the importance of early embryonic, ontogenetic and tissue interactions in shaping craniofacial evolution and ecological diversification in squamates, with implications for the nature of cranio-cerebral relations across vertebrates.

Indexed as

HeadSkullAnimalsOsteogenesis

Identifiers

PMID38200368
OpenAlexW4390696391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.