Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200268›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2024

Psychometric properties of the Caregiver's inventory neuropsychological diagnosis dementia (CINDD) in mild cognitive impairment and dementia.

Sofia Cuoco, Carlo Blundo, Monica Ricci, Arianna Cappiello, Rossella Bisogno, Immacolata Carotenuto, Anna Rosa Avallone, Roberto Erro, Maria Teresa Pellecchia, Marianna Amboni and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sofia CuocoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Carlo BlundoDepartment of Neuroscience, Center of Cognitive Disorders and Dementia, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Monica RicciDepartment of Neuroscience, Center of Cognitive Disorders and Dementia, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Arianna CappielloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Rossella BisognoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Immacolata CarotenutoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Anna Rosa AvalloneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Roberto ErroDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Maria Teresa PellecchiaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Marianna AmboniDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Paolo BaroneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy.
Marina PicilloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience section, Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (CEMAND), University of Salerno, Via Allende, Baronissi, 84081, Salerno, Italy. mpicillo@unisa.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9025-137X
University of Salerno · ITIRCCS San Camillo Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe Caregiver's Inventory Neuropsychological Diagnosis Dementia (CINDD) is an easy tool designed to quantify cognitive, behavioural and functional deficits of patients with cognitive impairment. Aim of the present study was to analyse the psychometric properties of the CINDD in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Dementia (D). DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThe CINDD, composed by 9 sub-domains, was administered to fifty-six caregivers of patients with different types of dementia (D) and 44 caregivers of patients with MCI. All patients underwent an extensive neuropsychological assessment, the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and functional autonomy scales. The reliability, convergent construct validity and possible cut-off of CINND were measured by Cronbach's alpha (α), Pearson's correlation and ROC analysis, respectively.

resultsThe D and MCI patients differed only for age (p=0.006). The internal consistency of CINDD was high (α= 0.969). The α-value for each CINDD domain was considered acceptable, except the mood domain (α=0.209). The CINDD total score correlated with cognitive screening tests; each domain of the CINDD correlated with the corresponding score from either tests or NPI (p<0.05), except for visuo-spatial perception skills and apathy. A screening cut-off equal to 59, can be used discriminate D from MCI (Sensitivity=0.70, Specificity=0.57).

conclusionThe CINDD is a feasible, accurate and reliable tool for the assessment of cognitive and behavioural difficulties in patients with different degree of cognitive impairment. It may be used to quantify and monitor caregiver-reported ecological data in both clinical and research settings.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaCaregiversHumansNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsBehavioral disordersClinical interviewCognitive disordersNeuropsychological evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38200268
PMCPMC10791830
OpenAlexW4390709047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.