Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200261›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2024

Introducing FRED: Software for Generating Feedback Reports for Ecological Momentary Assessment Data.

Aljoscha Rimpler, Björn S Siepe, Carlotta L Rieble, Ricarda K K Proppert, Eiko I Fried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aljoscha RimplerDepartment of Psychometrics and Statistics, University Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands. aljoscharimpler@gmail.com.ORCID 0009-0009-6131-7267
Björn S SiepePsychological Methods Lab, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9558-4648
Carlotta L RiebleDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4764-3906
Ricarda K K ProppertDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4225-2439
Eiko I FriedDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7469-594X

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 949059
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) is a data collection approach utilizing smartphone applications or wearable devices to gather insights into daily life. EMA has advantages over traditional surveys, such as increasing ecological validity. However, especially prolonged data collection can burden participants by disrupting their everyday activities. Consequently, EMA studies can have comparably high rates of missing data and face problems of compliance. Giving participants access to their data via accessible feedback reports, as seen in citizen science initiatives, may increase participant motivation. Existing frameworks to generate such reports focus on single individuals in clinical settings and do not scale well to large datasets. Here, we introduce FRED (Feedback Reports on EMA Data) to tackle the challenge of providing personalized reports to many participants. FRED is an interactive online tool in which participants can explore their own personalized data reports. We showcase FRED using data from the WARN-D study, where 867 participants were queried for 85 consecutive days with four daily and one weekly survey, resulting in up to 352 observations per participant. FRED includes descriptive statistics, time-series visualizations, and network analyses on selected EMA variables. Participants can access the reports online as part of a Shiny app, developed via the R programming language. We make the code and infrastructure of FRED available in the hope that it will be useful for both research and clinical settings, given that it can be flexibly adapted to the needs of other projects with the goal of generating personalized data reports.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentSoftwareAdultData CollectionFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsEcological Momentary AssessmentExperience Sampling MethodPersonalized FeedbackShiny App

Identifiers

PMID38200261
PMCPMC11196357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.