Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200240›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

A hybrid approach to dynamic cognitive psychometrics : Dynamic cognitive psychometrics.

Charlotte C Tanis, Andrew Heathcote, Mark Zrubka, Dora Matzke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Model-based analysis of stop-signal data reveals robust neural and clinical correlates of evidence accumulation but not inhibition.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Charlotte C TanisDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3466-4414
Andrew HeathcoteDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4324-5537
Mark ZrubkaDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Dora MatzkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Postbus 15916, 1001 NK, Amsterdam, Netherlands. d.matzke@uva.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1990-0175

Funding

Australian Research Council (ARC) grant DP160101891European Research Council 743086 UNIFYNetherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO) Vidi grant VI.Vidi.191.091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic cognitive psychometrics measures mental capacities based on the way behavior unfolds over time. It does so using models of psychological processes whose validity is grounded in research from experimental psychology and the neurosciences. However, these models can sometimes have undesirable measurement properties. We propose a "hybrid" modeling approach that achieves good measurement by blending process-based and descriptive components. We demonstrate the utility of this approach in the stop-signal paradigm, in which participants make a series of speeded choices, but occasionally are required to withhold their response when a "stop signal" occurs. The stop-signal paradigm is widely used to measure response inhibition based on a modeling framework that assumes a race between processes triggered by the choice and the stop stimuli. However, the key index of inhibition, the latency of the stop process (i.e., stop-signal reaction time), is not directly observable, and is poorly estimated when the choice and the stop runners are both modeled by psychologically realistic evidence-accumulation processes. We show that using a descriptive account of the stop process, while retaining a realistic account of the choice process, simultaneously enables good measurement of both stop-signal reaction time and the psychological factors that determine choice behavior. We show that this approach, when combined with hierarchical Bayesian estimation, is effective even in a complex choice task that requires participants to perform only a relatively modest number of test trials.

Indexed as

CognitionPsychometricsReaction TimeChoice BehaviorHumansInhibition, PsychologicalModels, PsychologicalChoice behaviorCognitive psychometricsReaction timesResponse inhibitionStop-signal paradigm

Identifiers

PMID38200240
PMCPMC11335914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.