ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2024
Direct enhancement of viral neutralising antibody potency by the complement system: a largely forgotten phenomenon.
Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Occurrence of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Avian Infectious Bronchitis in Target Animal Experiments.Veterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Immune Responses to Phage Therapy in Humans: A Review.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2026Review
- Progress and prospects for herpesvirus vaccination using gB antigens.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The diversity of cytomegalovirus among blood donors and transplant recipients could affect the effectiveness of specific anti-CMV immunoglobulins.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Development of a Novel Homogeneous Liposome-Based One-Step Assay for SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection in Human Serum Based on Fluorescent Liposomes and Complement Activity.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Complement-mediated enhancement of SARS-CoV-2 antibody neutralisation potency in vaccinated individuals.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Pox-AbDab: the orthopoxvirus antibody database.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- IgG1 versus IgG3: influence of antibody-specificity and allotypic variance on virus neutralization efficacy.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neutralisation assays are commonly used to assess vaccine-induced and naturally acquired immune responses; identify correlates of protection; and inform important decisions on the screening, development, and use of therapeutic antibodies. Neutralisation assays are useful tools that provide the gold standard for measuring the potency of neutralising antibodies, but they are not without limitations. Common methods such as the heat-inactivation of plasma samples prior to neutralisation assays, or the use of anticoagulants such as EDTA for blood collection, can inactivate the complement system. Even in non-heat-inactivated samples, the levels of complement activity can vary between samples. This can significantly impact the conclusions regarding neutralising antibody potency. Restoration of the complement system in these samples can be achieved using an exogenous source of plasma with preserved complement activity or with purified complement proteins. This can significantly enhance the neutralisation titres for some antibodies depending on characteristics such as antibody isotype and the epitope they bind, enable neutralisation with otherwise non-neutralising antibodies, and demonstrate a better relationship between in vitro and in vivo findings. In this review, we discuss the evidence for complement-mediated enhancement of antibody neutralisation against a range of viruses, explore the potential mechanisms which underpin this enhancement, highlight current gaps in the literature, and provide a brief summary of considerations for adopting this approach in future research applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.