Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200119›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2024

Prime editing using CRISPR-Cas12a and circular RNAs in human cells.

Ronghong Liang, Zixin He, Kevin Tianmeng Zhao, Haocheng Zhu, Jiacheng Hu, Guanwen Liu, Qiang Gao, Meiyan Liu, Rui Zhang, Jin-Long Qiu and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
17.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. RNA therapeutics: current status and future directions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Molecular mechanisms and biotechnology applications of CRISPR-Cas12a.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026
    Review
  11. A primer on prime: A prime editing update from advances to first-in-human trial.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolution of Prime Editing: Enhancing Efficiency and Expanding Capacity.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ronghong Liang *New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zixin He *New Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Kevin Tianmeng Zhao *Qi Biodesign, Beijing, China.
Haocheng ZhuNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiacheng HuNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-4618-8928
Guanwen LiuNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Qiang GaoQi Biodesign, Beijing, China.
Meiyan LiuNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Rui ZhangNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jin-Long QiuState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8054-2552
Caixia GaoNew Cornerstone Science Laboratory, Center for Genome Editing, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. cxgao@genetics.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3169-8248
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing with prime editors based on CRISPR-Cas9 is limited by the large size of the system and the requirement for a G/C-rich protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) sequence. Here, we use the smaller Cas12a protein to develop four circular RNA-mediated prime editor (CPE) systems: nickase-dependent CPE (niCPE), nuclease-dependent CPE (nuCPE), split nickase-dependent CPE (sniCPE) and split nuclease-dependent CPE (snuCPE). CPE systems preferentially recognize T-rich genomic regions and possess a potential multiplexing capacity in comparison to corresponding Cas9-based systems. The efficiencies of the nuclease-based systems are up to 10.42%, whereas niCPE and sniCPE reach editing frequencies of up to 24.89% and 40.75% without positive selection in human cells, respectively. A derivative system, called one-sniCPE, combines all three RNA editing components under a single promoter. By arraying CRISPR RNAs for different targets in one circular RNA, we also demonstrate low-efficiency editing of up to four genes simultaneously with the nickase prime editors niCPE and sniCPE.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingRNA, CircularBacterial ProteinsCRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesHEK293 CellsHumansRNABacterial ProteinsCas12a proteinCRISPR-Associated ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesRNARNA, Circular

Identifiers

PMID38200119
OpenAlexW4390701847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.