Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200100›Full record

SynthesisJournal of human hypertension2024

Efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists for the treatment of low-renin hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sonali S Shah, Jinghong Zhang, Stella May Gwini, Morag J Young, Peter J Fuller, Jun Yang

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of human hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Race and Ancestry in Primary Aldosteronism.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Is It Time to Retire Aldosterone Suppression Testing?American journal of hypertension · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sonali S ShahCentre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Vic, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5789-383X
Jinghong ZhangCentre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Vic, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3406-5035
Stella May GwiniCentre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Vic, Australia.
Morag J YoungCentre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Vic, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-5375
Peter J FullerCentre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Vic, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0948-2072
Jun YangCentre for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Vic, Australia. jun.yang@hudson.org.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4620-4976
Hudson Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute Alice Baker and Eleanor Shaw Gender Equity Fellowship.Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP1194576Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) APP2013946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is the leading risk factor for premature death. The optimal treatment of low-renin hypertension (LRH), present in 30% of hypertensive individuals, is not known. LRH likely reflects a state of excess salt, expanded volume and/or mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) activation. Therefore, targeted treatment with MR antagonists (MRA) may be beneficial. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the efficacy of MRA therapy in LRH. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched for randomised controlled trials of adults with LRH that compared the efficacy of MRA to placebo or other antihypertensive treatments. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model to estimate the difference in blood pressure and the certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The protocol is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022318763). From the 1612 records identified, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total sample size of 1043 participants. Seven studies (n = 345) were assessed as having a high risk of bias. Meta-analysis indicated that MRA reduced systolic blood pressure by -6.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval -9.6 to -4.1) and -4.8 mmHg (95% confidence interval -11.9 to 2.4) compared to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) and diuretics. The certainty of the evidence was assessed as moderate and very low, respectively. The findings of this systematic review suggest that MRA is effective in lowering blood pressure in LRH and may be better than ACEi/ARB. Translation to clinical practice is limited by the uncertainty of evidence.

Indexed as

HypertensionMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHumansRenin InhibitorsTreatment OutcomeAntihypertensive AgentsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsRenin Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38200100
PMCPMC11076210
OpenAlexW4390743324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.