Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38200056›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

A bite force database of 654 insect species.

Peter Thomas Rühr, Carina Edel, Melina Frenzel, Alexander Blanke

Open access · goldAbstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter Thomas RührBonn Institute for Organismic Biology (BIOB), Section 2: Animal Biodiversity, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany. pruehr@evolution.uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2776-6172
Carina EdelBonn Institute for Organismic Biology (BIOB), Section 2: Animal Biodiversity, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Melina FrenzelBonn Institute for Organismic Biology (BIOB), Section 2: Animal Biodiversity, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Alexander BlankeBonn Institute for Organismic Biology (BIOB), Section 2: Animal Biodiversity, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) BL 1355/4-1EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020) 754290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bite force is a decisive performance trait in animals because it plays a role for numerous life history components such as food consumption, inter- and intraspecific interactions, and reproductive success. Bite force has been studied across a wide range of vertebrate species, but only for 32 species of insects, the most speciose animal lineage. Here we present the insect bite force database with bite force measurements for 654 insect species covering 476 genera, 111 families, and 13 orders with body lengths ranging from 3.76 to 180.12 mm. In total we recorded 1906 bite force series from 1290 specimens, and, in addition, present basal head, body, and wing metrics. As such, the database will facilitate a wide range of studies on the characteristics, predictors, and macroevolution of bite force in the largest clade of the animal kingdom and may serve as a basis to further our understanding of macroevolutionary processes in relation to bite force across all biting metazoans.

Indexed as

InsectaAnimalsBite ForceBody HeightDatabases, Factual

Identifiers

PMID38200056
PMCPMC10781734
OpenAlexW4390792303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.