Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38199864›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Attention Drives Visual Processing and Audiovisual Integration During Multimodal Communication.

Noor Seijdel, Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen, Peter Hagoort, Linda Drijvers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noor SeijdelNeurobiology of Language Department - The Communicative Brain, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen 6525 XD, The Netherlands noor.seijdel@mpi.nl.
Jan-Mathijs SchoffelenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, 6525 HT, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0923-6610
Peter HagoortNeurobiology of Language Department - The Communicative Brain, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen 6525 XD, The Netherlands.
Linda DrijversNeurobiology of Language Department - The Communicative Brain, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen 6525 XD, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9154-7033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During communication in real-life settings, our brain often needs to integrate auditory and visual information and at the same time actively focus on the relevant sources of information, while ignoring interference from irrelevant events. The interaction between integration and attention processes remains poorly understood. Here, we use rapid invisible frequency tagging and magnetoencephalography to investigate how attention affects auditory and visual information processing and integration, during multimodal communication. We presented human participants (male and female) with videos of an actress uttering action verbs (auditory; tagged at 58 Hz) accompanied by two movie clips of hand gestures on both sides of fixation (attended stimulus tagged at 65 Hz; unattended stimulus tagged at 63 Hz). Integration difficulty was manipulated by a lower-order auditory factor (clear/degraded speech) and a higher-order visual semantic factor (matching/mismatching gesture). We observed an enhanced neural response to the attended visual information during degraded speech compared to clear speech. For the unattended information, the neural response to mismatching gestures was enhanced compared to matching gestures. Furthermore, signal power at the intermodulation frequencies of the frequency tags, indexing nonlinear signal interactions, was enhanced in the left frontotemporal and frontal regions. Focusing on the left inferior frontal gyrus, this enhancement was specific for the attended information, for those trials that benefitted from integration with a matching gesture. Together, our results suggest that attention modulates audiovisual processing and interaction, depending on the congruence and quality of the sensory input.

Indexed as

BrainSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAttentionFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMalePhotic StimulationSpeechVisual Perceptionattentionaudiovisual integrationmagnetoencephalography (MEG)multimodal communicationneural processingrapid invisible frequency tagging (RIFT)

Identifiers

PMID38199864
PMCPMC10919203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.