Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38199778›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Scoping review of interventions to improve continuity of postdischarge care for newborns in LMICs.

Gulraj Grewal, Sebastian S Fuller, Asma Rababeh, Michuki Maina, Mike English, Chris Paton, Chrysanthi Papoutsi

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Gulraj GrewalNuffield Department of Medicine, Center for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK gulraj.grewal@ndm.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9299-4054
Sebastian S FullerNuffield Department of Medicine, Center for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9284-6630
Asma RababehNuffield Department of Medicine, Center for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michuki MainaHealth Services Unit, KEMRI - Wellcome Trust Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0001-6874-8929
Mike EnglishNuffield Department of Medicine, Center for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7427-0826
Chris PatonNuffield Department of Medicine, Center for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Chrysanthi PapoutsiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeonatal mortality remains significant in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) with in-hospital mortality rates similar to those following discharge from healthcare facilities. Care continuity interventions have been suggested as a way of reducing postdischarge mortality by better linking care between facilities and communities. This scoping review aims to map and describe interventions used in LMICs to improve care continuity for newborns after discharge and examine assumptions underpinning the design and delivery of continuity.

methodsWe searched seven databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane library and (Ovid) Global health). Publications with primary data on interventions focused on continuity of care for newborns in LMICs were included. Extracted data included year of publication, study location, study design and type of intervention. Drawing on relevant theoretical frameworks and classifications, we assessed the extent to which interventions adopted participatory methods and how they attempted to establish continuity.

resultsA total of 65 papers were included in this review; 28 core articles with rich descriptions were prioritised for more in-depth analysis. Most articles adopted quantitative designs. Interventions focused on improving continuity and flow of information via education sessions led by community health workers during home visits. Extending previous frameworks, our findings highlight the importance of interpersonal continuity in LMICs where communication and relationships between family members, healthcare workers and members of the wider community play a vital role in creating support systems for postdischarge care. Only a small proportion of studies focused on high-risk babies. Some studies used participatory methods, although often without meaningful engagement in problem definition and intervention implementation.

conclusionEfforts to reduce neonatal mortality and morbidity should draw across multiple continuity logics (informational, relational, interpersonal and managerial) to strengthen care after hospital discharge in LMIC settings and further focus on high-risk neonates, as they often have the worst outcomes.

Indexed as

AftercareDeveloping CountriesCommunicationCommunity Health WorkersHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPatient DischargeChild healthHealth systemsPaediatricsPublic HealthReview

Identifiers

PMID38199778
PMCPMC10806884
OpenAlexW4390708183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.