Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38199630›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial.

Wenxi Zhang, Li Deng, Fan Yang, Jianhong Liu, Sijing Chen, Xiaolin You, Jiani Gou, Dan Zi, Yonghong Li, Xiaoxue Qi and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06663553 (Protocol for a Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06663553 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Protocol for a Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery (TU-LESS) and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Hysterectomy Performed on Patients With Enlarged Uterus: A Prospective Single-blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China Second University HospitalRan2025 to 2028Enrolled210ConditionsEnlarged Uterus, Adenomyosis, Uterine Fibroids (UF)ArmsTU-LESS, vNOTES
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wenxi ZhangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6987-5022
Li DengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jianhong LiuDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Sijing ChenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaolin YouDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jiani GouDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Dan ZiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Yonghong LiDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Wenjiang Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoxue QiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Chengdu First People's Hospital (Chengdu Integrated TCM&Western Medicine), Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yanzhou WangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, China 3636647084@qq.com w.y.z@foxmail.com.
Ying ZhengDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China 3636647084@qq.com w.y.z@foxmail.com.
Sichuan University · CNArmy Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College · CNGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNPeople’s Hospital of Wenshan Prefecture · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHysterectomy is the most common surgical procedure in the field of gynaecology. The traditional multiport laparoscopy, transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (TU-LESS) and transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) hysterectomy approaches have been implemented to varying degrees in clinical practice. At present, although their feasibility has been proven, there are no large randomised controlled studies on postoperative rehabilitation. This study aims to evaluate postoperative recovery and assess the safety and effectiveness of these three surgical approaches for total laparoscopic hysterectomy. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, randomised, single-blind, three-arm, parallel-group, interventional clinical trial. Recruitment will be carried out in five tertiary hospitals in China. Patients diagnosed with benign uterine disease or precancerous lesions will be assigned to the vNOTES group, TU-LESS group and conventional laparoscopy group at a 1:1:1 ratio. The achievement rate of comprehensive indices of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) within 24 hours postoperatively will be considered the primary outcome (the comprehensive indicators of ERAS include fluid intake, passing flatus, urination after catheter removal, ambulation and a Visual Analogue Scale score ≤3.) This study will use a non-inferiority test, with a power (1-ß) of 80% and a margin of -0.15, at a one-sided α of 0.0125. The sample size will be 480 patients (including an assumed 15% dropout rate), calculated according to the primary outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved on 25 April 2022 by the Medical Ethics Committee of West China Second University Hospital (2022(057)), Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. All participants will be required to provide informed consent before their participation in the study. The results of the trial will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at international conferences. PROTOCOL VERSION: V.3.0, 31 August 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2200057405.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryHysterectomyChinaDevice RemovalFemaleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodAdult surgeryClinical TrialMinimally invasive surgeryPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProtocols & guidelinesRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID38199630
PMCPMC10807007
OpenAlexW4390693849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.