Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38199619›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Risk factors and glycaemic control in small-for-gestational-age infants born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus: a case-control study using propensity score matching based on a large population.

Jianing Li, Yuqing Pan, Qingxiang Zheng, Xiaoqian Chen, Xiumin Jiang, Rulin Liu, Yu Zhu, Ling Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jianing LiFujian Medical University School of Nursing, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yuqing PanFujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetric & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Qingxiang ZhengFujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetric & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Xiaoqian ChenFujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetric & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Xiumin JiangFujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetric & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fuzhou, Fujian, China jzc0427@163.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4133-5301
Rulin LiuFujian Medical University School of Nursing, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Yu ZhuFujian Medical University School of Nursing, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Ling HuangFujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetric & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Fuzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CNFujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmall for gestational age (SGA) poses a significant concern for newborns, being linked to neonatal complications and potential metabolic disorders in adulthood, especially when born to mothers with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), elevating their risk of complications and mortality. However, the pregnancy risk factors and glycaemic control associated with SGA infants born to mothers with GDM remain unclear.

aimTo identify the pregnancy risk factors and glycaemic control associated with SGA infants born to mothers with GDM.

methodThis case-control study was conducted among 1910 women with GDM in China. Data were collected by the integrated electronic medical record system. Using 1:4 propensity score matching analysis, we adjusted for gestational age as confounder. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors.

resultsRisk factors for SGA born to mothers with GDM included a history of low birth weight, gestational hypertension, oligohydramnios, short maternal height, underweight pre-pregnancy body mass index and inadequate weight growth. While SGA was protected by weakly positive ketonuria levels in the first trimester, multiparous, anaemia and previous uterine scar were protective factors for SGA. Moreover, 2-hour postprandial glucose and haemoglobin A1c in the second trimester, as well as the 0-hour and 2-hour 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were linked to risk of SGA.

conclusionsSGA infants are the result of multifactorial interactions among GDM pregnant women. Notably, glycaemic control levels were associated with SGA. There is a need for enhanced perinatal monitoring and antenatal care to reduce SGA.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalCase-Control StudiesFemaleGlycemic ControlHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMothersPregnancyPropensity ScoreChild protectionDiabetes in pregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38199619
PMCPMC10806598
OpenAlexW4390708428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.