Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38199528›Full record

Trial reportOphthalmology2024

Evaluating Primary Treatment for People with Advanced Glaucoma: Five-Year Results of the Treatment of Advanced Glaucoma Study.

Anthony J King, Jemma Hudson, Augusto Azuara-Blanco, Jennifer Burr, Ashleigh Kernohan, Tara Homer, Hosein Shabaninejad, John M Sparrow, David Garway-Heath, Keith Barton and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Management and outcomes of primary open-angle glaucoma.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Early safety and efficacy outcomes of the PAUL glaucoma implant in a Spanish population: A retrospective study.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Intraocular Pressure Matters.Ophthalmology. Glaucoma
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Anthony J KingNottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, United Kingdom. Electronic address: anthony.king@nottingham.ac.uk.
Jemma HudsonCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Augusto Azuara-BlancoCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Jennifer BurrSchool of Medicine, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, United Kingdom.
Ashleigh KernohanHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Tara HomerHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Hosein ShabaninejadHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
John M SparrowBristol Eye Hospital, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.
David Garway-HeathNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
Keith BartonNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.
John NorrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Tracey DavidsonCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
Luke ValeHealth Economics Group, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Graeme MacLennanCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials (CHaRT), Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
TAGS Study Group∗
Newcastle University · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether primary trabeculectomy or medical treatment produces better outcomes in terms of quality of life (QoL), clinical effectiveness, and safety in patients with advanced glaucoma.

designMulticenter randomized controlled trial.

participantsBetween June 3, 2014, and May 31, 2017, 453 adults with newly diagnosed advanced open-angle glaucoma in at least 1 eye (Hodapp classification) were recruited from 27 secondary care glaucoma departments in the United Kingdom. Two hundred twenty-seven were allocated to trabeculectomy, and 226 were allocated medical management.

methodsParticipants were randomized on a 1:1 basis to have either mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy or escalating medical management with intraocular pressure (IOP)-reducing drops as the primary intervention and were followed up for 5 years.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was vision-specific QoL measured with the 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) at 5 years. Secondary outcomes were general health status, glaucoma-related QoL, clinical effectiveness (IOP, visual field, and visual acuity), and safety.

resultsAt 5 years, the mean ± standard deviation VFQ-25 scores in the trabeculectomy and medication arms were 83.3 ± 15.5 and 81.3 ± 17.5, respectively, and the mean difference was 1.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.99 to 4.00; P = 0.51). The mean IOPs were 12.07 ± 5.18 mmHg and 14.76 ± 4.14 mmHg, respectively, and the mean difference was -2.56 (95% CI, -3.80 to -1.32; P < 0.001). Glaucoma severity measured with visual field mean deviation were -14.30 ± 7.14 dB and -16.74 ± 6.78 dB, respectively, with a mean difference of 1.87 (95% CI, 0.87-2.87 dB; P < 0.001). Safety events occurred in 115 (52.2%) of patients in the trabeculectomy arm and 124 (57.9%) of patients in the medication arm (relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72-1.19; P = 0.54). Serious adverse events were rare.

conclusionsAt 5 years, the Treatment of Advanced Glaucoma Study demonstrated that primary trabeculectomy surgery is more effective in lowering IOP and preventing disease progression than primary medical treatment in patients with advanced disease and has a similar safety profile. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressureMitomycinQuality of LifeTrabeculectomyVisual AcuityVisual FieldsAgedAged, 80 and overAlkylating AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedAlkylating AgentsAntihypertensive AgentsMitomycinOphthalmic SolutionsIntraocular pressureOpen-angle glaucomaQuality of lifeRandomized controlled trialVisual field loss

Identifiers

PMID38199528
PMCPMC11190021
OpenAlexW4390685927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.