Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38198778›Full record

ArticleDigestion2024

A Novel Dry Simulator Model for Learning Comprehensive Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography/Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Procedures while Minimizing Adverse Bleeding Events (with Video).

Yutaka Hatayama, Takeshi Kanno, Tetsuya Takikawa, Ryotaro Matsumoto, Yutaro Arata, Suguo Suzuki, Yohei Ogata, Masahiro Saito, Xiaoyi Jin, Shin Miura and 9 more

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Digestion, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yutaka HatayamaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Takeshi KannoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tetsuya TakikawaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Ryotaro MatsumotoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yutaro ArataGraduate Medical Education Center, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Suguo SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yohei OgataDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Masahiro SaitoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Xiaoyi JinDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shin MiuraDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Waku HattaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Shin HamadaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kaname UnoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kiyoshi KumeDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kazuhiro KikutaDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Naoki AsanoDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Akira ImataniDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tomoyuki KoikeDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Atsushi MasamuneDivision of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tohoku University · JPTohoku University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) are essential skills for performing endoscopic cholangiopancreatic procedures. However, these procedures have a high incidence of adverse events, and current training predominantly relies on patient-based approaches. Herein, we aimed to develop an ERCP/EST simulator model to address the need for safer training alternatives, especially for learners with limited ERCP experience.

methodsThe model was designed to facilitate the use of actual endoscopic devices, supporting learning objectives that align with the components of the validated Bethesda ERCP Skill Assessment Tool (BESAT). BESAT focuses on skills, such as papillary alignment, maintenance of duodenoscope position, gentle and efficient cannulation, controlled sphincterotomy in the correct trajectory, and guidewire manipulation. Thirty gastroenterology trainees used the simulator between May 2022 and March 2023, and their satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and pre- and post-training questionnaires.

resultsThe novel simulator model comprised a disposable duodenal papillary section, suitable for incision with an electrosurgical knife, alongside washable upper gastrointestinal tract and bile duct sections for repeated use. The duodenal papillary section enabled reproduction of a realistic endoscope position and the adverse bleeding events due to improper incisions. The bile duct section allowed for the reproduction of fluoroscopic-like images, enabling learners to practice guidewire guidance and insertion of other devices. Following training, the median VAS score reflecting the expectation for model learning significantly increased from 69.5 (interquartile range [IQR]: 55.5-76.5) to 85.5 (IQR: 78.0-92.0) (p < 0.01). All participants expressed a desire for repeated simulator training sessions.

conclusionsThis innovative simulator could serve as a practical educational tool, particularly beneficial for novices in ERCP. It could facilitate hands-on practice with actual devices, enhancing procedural fluency and understanding of precise incisions to minimize the risk of bleeding complications during EST.

Indexed as

Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeSphincterotomy, EndoscopicBile DuctsCatheterizationDuodenoscopesHumansTreatment OutcomeComplicationEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography endoscopic sphincterotomySimulationTraining

Identifiers

PMID38198778
PMCPMC10994596
OpenAlexW4390743660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.