Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38198723›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Unpacking the cost of the lunchbox for Australian families: a secondary analysis.

Alexandra C Manson, Brittany J Johnson, Luke Wolfenden, Rachel Sutherland, Rebecca K Golley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Global parent perspectives on school food service internationally: A mixed papers narrative review.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. PolicyPublic health nutrition · 2025
    Article
  3. Packed Lunch Provision and Consumption in Early Years Settings in Sheffield: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra C MansonFlinders University, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5655-4040
Brittany J JohnsonFlinders University, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5492-9219
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6178-3868
Rachel SutherlandHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, NSW 2287, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5337-1751
Rebecca K GolleyFlinders University, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Bedford Park, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5197-7987

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program ScholarshipHunter Children's Research FoundationHunter Medical Research InstituteHunter New England Population HealthKing and Amy O'Malley Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ninety per cent of Australian school children bring a home-packed lunch to school, with 44% of the food consumed during school hours being unhealthy. Among other factors, cost is a key consideration for food provision; however, the costs to Australian families are not well understood. Therefore, we aimed to determine what families are currently paying for school lunchboxes in Australian primary schools and to examine associations between food costs and socio-demographic factors with dietary quality. An audit of local retail outlets was used to determine the food costs of lunchbox contents. Costs (AUD) were adjusted for inflation as of early 2023. The lunchboxes of 1026 children aged 4-12 years at 12 Catholic primary schools in New South Wales, Australia, were assessed at the start of the day, using photography assessment methods and a validated School Food Checklist. The mean cost of lunchbox contents was $4.48 AUD (SD 1.53), containing a mean energy of 2699 kJ (SD 859), with 37.3% (SD 23.9) of energy sourced from unhealthy foods. Multiple linear regression analyses found that the strongest predictors of higher lunchbox cost (P < 0.05) were a higher proportion of energy from unhealthy foods (B = 0.016) and lower Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (B = -0.178), when controlling for child socio-demographics. The results indicated that lunchbox food costs to Australian families are comparable to alternative school food service models in Australia and internationally. Results demonstrate the cost of food is not the only barrier to providing a healthy school lunchbox. Demonstrating a need for cost-considerate systematic interventions addressing food provision challenges and socio-economic disparities faced by families.

Indexed as

FoodFood ServicesAustraliaChildHumansMarketingNew South Walescostnutritionpacked lunchprimary schoolschool food

Identifiers

PMID38198723
PMCPMC10781432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.