Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38198395›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2024

Teaching of sexual medicine and gender issues in medical courses: students' perception.

Alberto Trapani Junior, Manuela Silva Giordani, Mariana Martins Notari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alberto Trapani JuniorUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Brazilian Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Associations, São José Regional Hospital Dr. Homero de Miranda Gomes, Palhoça Medicine Course.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0196-4488
Manuela Silva GiordaniUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina - Palhoça (SC), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8110-4271
Mariana Martins NotariUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina - Palhoça (SC), Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5339-308X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn addition to reproductive purposes, human sexuality and sexual health are matters of great importance in the medical office. Despite this, there is still a deficiency in the training of Brazilian medical students regarding sexual medicine and gender issues.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to analyze the perception of fifth- and sixth-year students in relation to the teaching of sexual medicine and gender issues in medical courses.

methodsThis is a descriptive and cross-sectional study with students from the last 2 years of medical schools in the State of Santa Catarina (internship classes), through the application of a self-administered, semi-structured online questionnaire.

resultsA total of 164 students answered the questionnaire, with 83.5% (137/164) saying they had taken classes on sexual medicine and 47% (77/164) saying they had taken classes on gender issues. The participants judged the teaching inadequate in most of the topics addressed, and there was no significant difference between students from public and private schools. Notably, 79.9% (131/164) of the students considered the teaching of sexual medicine insufficient or inadequate, while 87.8% (144/164) considered the teaching of gender issues insufficient or inadequate.

conclusionThe vast majority of students consider the teaching of sexual medicine and gender issues insufficient and inadequate.

Indexed as

SexismStudents, MedicalBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPerception

Identifiers

PMID38198395
PMCPMC10768678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.