Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38198301›Full record

ArticleBrazilian oral research2024

Cytotoxicity evaluation, antibacterial effect, and degree of conversion of QAM-containing adhesives.

Isadora Martini Garcia, Tatiana Féres Assad-Loss, Luis Felipe Jochinms Schneider, Fabrício Mezzomo Collares, Larissa Maria Assad Cavalcante, Mônica Almeida Tostes

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian oral research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isadora Martini GarciaUniversity of Maryland School of Dentistry, Department of General Dentistry, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-0200
Tatiana Féres Assad-LossUniversidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, School of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7457-8735
Luis Felipe Jochinms SchneiderUniversidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, School of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7154-8845
Fabrício Mezzomo CollaresUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, School of Dentistry, Laboratory of Dental Materials, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1382-0150
Larissa Maria Assad CavalcanteUniversidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, School of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8442-3497
Mônica Almeida TostesUniversidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, School of Dentistry, Graduate Program in Dentistry, Federal Fluminense University, Niterói, RJ, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6878-7482
Universidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BRUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of adding quaternary ammonium methacrylates (QAMs) to experimental adhesives by assessing the degree of conversion (DC), cytotoxicity against keratinocytes and fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity against biofilm formation. Two QAMs were added to an experimental adhesive: dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate bromododecane (DMADDM) or dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate bromohexadecane (DMAHDM) at three concentrations each: 1, 2.5, and 5 wt.%. Experimental adhesive without QAMs (control group) and commercially available Transbond XT Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA) were used for comparisons. The adhesives were tested for DC, cytotoxicity against keratinocytes and fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity against biofilm formation. DC, cytotoxicity against fibroblasts, and antibacterial activity were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons. Cytotoxicity against keratinocytes was evaluated using the Kruskal Wallis and Dunn's post-hoc (α = 5%) tests. Transbond showed lower DC as compared to 5% DMAHDM, 1% DMADDM, and 5% DMADDM (p < 0.05). However, all groups presented proper DC when compared to commercial adhesives in the literature. In the evaluation of cytotoxicity against keratinocytes, Transbond induced higher viability than 2.5 wt.% groups (p < 0.05). Against fibroblasts, Transbond induced higher viability as compared to 5 wt.% groups (p < 0.05). DMAHDM at 5 wt.% reduced biofilm formation when compared to all the other groups (p < 0.05). Despite their cytotoxic effect against keratinocytes, gingival fibroblasts showed higher viability. DMAHDM at 5 wt.% decreased Streptococcus mutans viability. The incorporation of DMAHDM at 5 wt.% may be a strategy for reducing the development of white spot lesions.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateHydrocarbons, BrominatedMethacrylatesMethylaminesQuaternary Ammonium Compounds1-bromododecaneAnti-Bacterial AgentsBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylatedimethylaminododecyl methacrylatedimethylaminohexadecyl methacrylateHydrocarbons, BrominatedMethacrylatesMethylaminesQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsTransbond

Identifiers

PMID38198301
PMCPMC11376641
OpenAlexW4390603771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.