Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38198295›Full record

ArticleEuropean thyroid journal2024

The Diagnostic Utility of Repeat Fine-needle Aspirations of Benign Thyroid Nodules.

Rachelle Mendoza, Richard Cody Simon, Nicole A Cipriani, Tatjana Antic

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European thyroid journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rachelle MendozaR Mendoza, Pathology, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, 60637-5416, United States.
Richard Cody SimonR Simon, Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, United States.
Nicole A CiprianiN Cipriani, Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, United States.
Tatjana AnticT Antic, Pathology, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, United States.
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective This study aims to analyze the diagnostic utility of multiple repeat FNA on thyroid nodules with initially benign diagnosis. Methods In a 5-year period, 1658 thyroid nodules with initially benign FNAs were retrospectively reviewed and followed for subsequent resection and repeat biopsy. Results Out of 2150 thyroid nodules, 1658 (77.1%) were diagnosed as benign on FNAs. The average age was 57.4 years (range 11-93 years), and most were females (83.8%). Repeat FNA was performed on 183 benign nodules, of which 141 (8.5%) were sampled a second time and 42 (2.5%) had 2 or more repeat samplings. For the benign nodules without repeat FNAs, 124 had benign resection. Of cases with one-time repeat FNA, most (n=101) remained benign on repeat FNAs, 13 of which were benign on resection. Eleven had atypical repeat FNAs, 5 were resected, 4 of which were benign and one was atypical follicular neoplasm with HRAS and TERT promoter mutations. Of cases with multiple repeat FNA, most (n=35) were still benign on repeat FNAs, one had benign resection. Two had atypical repeat biopsies, one was PTC on resection with CCD6::RET fusion. The positive predictive value significantly decreased from 41.1% on single FNA to 8.3% on one-time repeat (p<0.001) and 16.7% on multiple repeat (p=0.002). The total cost for workup of previously benign nodules was $285,454. Conclusions Repeat FNA biopsies did not provide an additional diagnostic value in the evaluation of benign thyroid nodules, and often led to unwarranted follow-up procedures and significantly increased health care cost.

Identifiers

PMID38198295
PMCPMC10959051
OpenAlexW4390708554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.