Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38198064›Full record

ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Inter-fractional portability of deep learning models for lung target tracking on cine imaging acquired in MRI-guided radiotherapy.

Jiayuan Peng, Hayley B Stowe, Pamela P Samson, Clifford G Robinson, Cui Yang, Weigang Hu, Zhen Zhang, Taeho Kim, Geoffrey D Hugo, Thomas R Mazur and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jiayuan PengAcademy for Engineering and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Hayley B StoweDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, 63110, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Pamela P SamsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, 63110, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Clifford G RobinsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, 63110, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Cui YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Weigang HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Zhen ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Taeho KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, 63110, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Geoffrey D HugoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, 63110, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Thomas R Mazur *Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, 63110, St. Louis, MO, USA. tmazur@wustl.edu.
Bin Cai *Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, 63110, St. Louis, MO, USA. Bin.Cai@UTSouthwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-3664

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI-guided radiotherapy systems enable beam gating by tracking the target on planar, two-dimensional cine images acquired during treatment. This study aims to evaluate how deep-learning (DL) models for target tracking that are trained on data from one fraction can be translated to subsequent fractions. Cine images were acquired for six patients treated on an MRI-guided radiotherapy platform (MRIdian, Viewray Inc.) with an onboard 0.35 T MRI scanner. Three DL models (U-net, attention U-net and nested U-net) for target tracking were trained using two training strategies: (1) uniform training using data obtained only from the first fraction with testing performed on data from subsequent fractions and (2) adaptive training in which training was updated each fraction by adding 20 samples from the current fraction with testing performed on the remaining images from that fraction. Tracking performance was compared between algorithms, models and training strategies by evaluating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD95) between automatically generated and manually specified contours. The mean DSC for all six patients in comparing manual contours and contours generated by the onboard algorithm (OBT) were 0.68 ± 0.16. Compared to OBT, the DSC values improved 17.0 - 19.3% for the three DL models with uniform training, and 24.7 - 25.7% for the models based on adaptive training. The HD95 values improved 50.6 - 54.5% for the models based on adaptive training. DL-based techniques achieved better tracking performance than the onboard, registration-based tracking approach. DL-based tracking performance improved when implementing an adaptive strategy that augments training data fraction-by-fraction.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLungMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsAdaptive trainingArtificial intelligenceMRgRTMRI-guided radiotherapyTumor tracking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.