Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38197980›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2024

Bat Motion can be Described by Leap Frogging.

Lucy Henley, Owen Jones, Fiona Mathews, Thomas E Woolley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucy HenleyCardiff School of Mathematics Cardiff University, Senghennydd Road, Cardiff, CF24 4AG, UK.
Owen JonesCardiff School of Mathematics Cardiff University, Senghennydd Road, Cardiff, CF24 4AG, UK.
Fiona MathewsUniversity of Sussex, John Maynard Smith Building, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK.
Thomas E WoolleyCardiff School of Mathematics Cardiff University, Senghennydd Road, Cardiff, CF24 4AG, UK. woolleyt1@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6225-5365

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council BV27002123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present models of bat motion derived from radio-tracking data collected over 14 nights. The data presents an initial dispersal period and a return to roost period. Although a simple diffusion model fits the initial dispersal motion we show that simple convection cannot provide a description of the bats returning to their roost. By extending our model to include non-autonomous parameters, or a leap frogging form of motion, where bats on the exterior move back first, we find we are able to accurately capture the bat's motion. We discuss ways of distinguishing between the two movement descriptions and, finally, consider how the different motion descriptions would impact a bat's hunting strategy.

Indexed as

ChiropteraFlight, AnimalAnimalsMathematical ConceptsModels, BiologicalBat motionPartial differential equations

Identifiers

PMID38197980
PMCPMC10781826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.