ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024
Surgical evidence-based comparison of [
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Survival benefit of ⁶⁸Ga-FAPI PET/CT staging for prognostic assessment in gastric and colorectal cancer compared with CE-CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT: a single-center retrospective study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Superiority of [Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Comparison of [Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Design, Synthesis, and Evaluation of OncoFAP Derivatives with the Albumin Binder as Novel Antitumor Radiopharmaceuticals.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Emerging Radiopharmaceuticals Beyond FDG for Ovarian Cancer: A Review of Advances in Nuclear Medicine.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided omental biopsy: a single-center prospective study.European radiology · 2025Article
- FAPI radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear oncology and theranostics of solid tumours: are we nearer to surrounding the hallmarks of cancer?Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeImaging assessment of abdominopelvic tumor burden is crucial for debulking surgery decision in ovarian cancer patients. This study aims to compare the efficiency of [
methodsThirty-six patients with suspected/confirmed ovarian cancer were enrolled and underwent integrated [
results[
conclusion[
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.