ArticleBiomolecules & biomedicine2024
Risk and prognosis of second cutaneous melanoma after radiotherapy for breast cancer: A population-based analysis.
Article in Biomolecules & biomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adjuvant radiotherapy and skin cancer risk in breast cancer survivors: a nationwide cohort study in Korea.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Is Radiotherapy a Risk Factor for Melanoma?Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT), a primary treatment for breast cancer (BC), may be associated with increased non-BC tumor risk. We aimed to examine second cutaneous melanoma (SCM) risk in BC patients who underwent RT and to assess their survival outcomes. Data from 520,977 BC patients diagnosed between 1973-2018 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Cumulative SCM incidence was estimated using the Fine-Gray competing risk model. Poisson regression analysis was conducted to calculate the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and estimate the SCM relative risk in patients who underwent RT compared to those who did not. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed using the Kaplan‒Meier method. Among the 520,977 BC patients, 243,676 (46.8%) underwent surgery and RT, while 277,301 (53.2%) only underwent surgery. Our results suggest that BC patients receiving RT had a higher SCM risk than those who did not (hazard ratio [HR] 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.51; P < 0.001). SCM incidence was also higher in BC patients treated with RT than in the general US population (SIR 1.12; 95% CI 1.05-1.19; P < 0.05). However, SCM patients who received RT had a significantly higher 10-year survival rate than those who did not receive RT (14.90% vs 5.94%; P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in 10-year OS or 5-year CSS between SCM following RT and only primary cutaneous melanoma (OPCM), but SCM patients who did not receive RT had a significantly lower 10-year OS, with no significant difference in CSS. This study suggests an increased SCM likelihood in BC patients due to RT, although the overall risk is minimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.