Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38197752›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2024

Training ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrostomy technique with porcine model.

Jae Yong Jeong, Dae Young Jun, Young Joon Moon, Dong Hyuk Kang, Hae Do Jung, Seung Hyun Jeon, Joo Yong Lee

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jae Yong JeongDepartment of Urology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8577-3920
Dae Young JunDepartment of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7928-5659
Young Joon MoonDepartment of Urology, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4711-772X
Dong Hyuk KangDepartment of Urology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0814-7336
Hae Do JungDepartment of Urology, Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8287-585X
Seung Hyun JeonDepartment of Urology, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0915-8106
Joo Yong LeeDepartment of Urology, Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3470-1767
Yonsei University · KRInha University · KRInje University Ilsan Paik Hospital · KRKyung Hee University Medical Center · KRKyungpook National University Hospital · KRNational Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital · KR

Funding

Korean Society for Urological Ultrasonography 2020-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is increasing interest in the use of ultrasound for endoscopic and percutaneous procedures. Access can be achieved without radiation exposure under ultrasound guidance. Our aim was to develop a porcine-based training model for ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal access that could also be personalized to a specific patient. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Severance Hospital approved the study protocol. An anesthetized pig was placed in the dorsal lithotomy position. For the nephrostomy puncture, a Chiba biopsy needle with an echo tip was used under ultrasound guidance. Eight residents and three consultants in urology participated. Puncture time was defined as the nephrostomy time to confirm the flow of irrigation via the needle. After training, satisfaction survey results for clinical usability and procedural difficulty were evaluated.

resultsThe 5-point Likert scale satisfaction survey for clinical usability and procedural difficulty found mean results of 4.64 and 4.09 points, respectively. There were no differences between residents and consultants for either variable. For all participants combined, there was a significant difference for nephrostomy time between the first and second trials (278.8±70.6 s vs. 244.5±47.0 s; p=0.007). The between-trial difference was greater for residents (291.5±71.2 s vs. 259.1±41.9 s; p=0.039). The difference for the consultant was not significant (245.0±69.4 s vs. 205.7±42.5 s; p=0.250).

conclusionsWe developed a porcine-based ultrasound-guided nephrostomy puncture training model. Satisfaction survey results indicated high clinical usability and procedural difficulty. For nephrostomy time, the model was more effective for urology residents than for consultants.

Indexed as

Nephrostomy, PercutaneousAnimalsHumansKidneyPuncturesSwineUltrasonographyUltrasonography, InterventionalNephrolithotomy, percutaneousRadiationTeachingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID38197752
PMCPMC10789536
OpenAlexW4390297951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.