Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38197739›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2024

Contrast response function estimation with nonparametric Bayesian active learning.

Dom C P Marticorena, Quinn Wai Wong, Jake Browning, Ken Wilbur, Samyukta Jayakumar, Pinakin Gunvant Davey, Aaron R Seitz, Jacob R Gardner, Dennis L Barbour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dom C P MarticorenaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Quinn Wai WongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jake BrowningDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ken WilburDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Samyukta JayakumarDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, USA.
Pinakin Gunvant DaveyCollege of Optometry, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, CA, USA.
Aaron R SeitzDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Jacob R GardnerDepartment of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Dennis L BarbourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

AGING AND DEVELOPMENTT32AG000030 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DENISE HEAD, Jeffrey M Zacks · 1985 to 2026
$9.7M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cognitive, Computational and Systems Neuroscience (CCSN)T32NS115672 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TODD S BRAVER, Camillo Padoa-Schioppa · 2020 to 2026
$1.8M
Integrating Perceptual Learning Approaches into Effective Therapies for Low VisioR01EY023582 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI SEITZ, AARON R · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Interdisciplinary Training in Cognitive, Computational and Systems NeuroscienceT32NS073547 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARBOUR, DENNIS L, PETERSEN, STEVEN E. · 2011 to 2015
$850k
Using Population Contrast Sensitivity Function Data to Develop Tunable Test ProceduresR21EY033553 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARBOUR, DENNIS L, GARDNER, JACOB · 2022 to 2023
$456k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023582NEI NIH HHS R21 EY033553NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000030NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS073547NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS115672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multidimensional psychometric functions can typically be estimated nonparametrically for greater accuracy or parametrically for greater efficiency. By recasting the estimation problem from regression to classification, however, powerful machine learning tools can be leveraged to provide an adjustable balance between accuracy and efficiency. Contrast sensitivity functions (CSFs) are behaviorally estimated curves that provide insight into both peripheral and central visual function. Because estimation can be impractically long, current clinical workflows must make compromises such as limited sampling across spatial frequency or strong assumptions on CSF shape. This article describes the development of the machine learning contrast response function (MLCRF) estimator, which quantifies the expected probability of success in performing a contrast detection or discrimination task. A machine learning CSF can then be derived from the MLCRF. Using simulated eyes created from canonical CSF curves and actual human contrast response data, the accuracy and efficiency of the machine learning contrast sensitivity function (MLCSF) was evaluated to determine its potential utility for research and clinical applications. With stimuli selected randomly, the MLCSF estimator converged slowly toward ground truth. With optimal stimulus selection via Bayesian active learning, convergence was nearly an order of magnitude faster, requiring only tens of stimuli to achieve reasonable estimates. Inclusion of an informative prior provided no consistent advantage to the estimator as configured. MLCSF achieved efficiencies on par with quickCSF, a conventional parametric estimator, but with systematically higher accuracy. Because MLCSF design allows accuracy to be traded off against efficiency, it should be explored further to uncover its full potential.

Indexed as

Contrast SensitivityBayes TheoremEyeHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID38197739
PMCPMC10790677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.