ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated segmentation and quantification of peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures using swept-source optical coherence tomography.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of 3D Deep Learning Classifiers for Glaucoma Detection: A Comparison of Cross-Domain and Device-Specific Models.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Impact of Optic Nerve Tortuosity, Globe Proptosis, and Size on Retinal Ganglion Cell Thickness Across General, Glaucoma, and Myopic Populations.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Advances in Glaucoma Diagnosis and Treatment: Integrating Innovations for Enhanced Patient Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Improves Rate of Change Detection in Progressing Glaucomatous Eyes Compared With Standard-Field Imaging.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We wanted to develop a deep-learning algorithm to automatically segment optic nerve head (ONH) and macula structures in three-dimensional (3D) wide-field optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans and to assess whether 3D ONH or macula structures (or a combination of both) provide the best diagnostic power for glaucoma. Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was performed using 319 OCT scans of glaucoma eyes and 298 scans of nonglaucoma eyes. Scans were compensated to improve deep-tissue visibility. We developed a deep-learning algorithm to automatically label major tissue structures, trained with 270 manually annotated B-scans. The performance was assessed using the Dice coefficient (DC). A glaucoma classification algorithm (3D-CNN) was then designed using 500 OCT volumes and corresponding automatically segmented labels. This algorithm was trained and tested on three datasets: cropped scans of macular tissues, those of ONH tissues, and wide-field scans. The classification performance for each dataset was reported using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Our segmentation algorithm achieved a DC of 0.94 ± 0.003. The classification algorithm was best able to diagnose glaucoma using wide-field scans, followed by ONH scans, and finally macula scans, with AUCs of 0.99 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.06 and 0.91 ± 0.11, respectively. Conclusions: This study showed that wide-field OCT may allow for significantly improved glaucoma diagnosis over typical OCTs of the ONH or macula. Translational Relevance: This could lead to mainstream clinical adoption of 3D wide-field OCT scan technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.