Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38197730›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Are Macula or Optic Nerve Head Structures Better at Diagnosing Glaucoma? An Answer Using Artificial Intelligence and Wide-Field Optical Coherence Tomography.

Charis Y N Chiang, Fabian A Braeu, Thanadet Chuangsuwanich, Royston K Y Tan, Jacqueline Chua, Leopold Schmetterer, Alexandre H Thiery, Martin L Buist, Michaël J A Girard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Big data for imaging assessment in glaucoma.Taiwan journal of ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Charis Y N ChiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Fabian A BraeuOphthalmic Engineering & Innovation Laboratory, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Thanadet ChuangsuwanichDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Royston K Y TanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Jacqueline ChuaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Leopold SchmettererSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Alexandre H ThieryDepartment of Statistics and Data Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Martin L BuistDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Michaël J A GirardOphthalmic Engineering & Innovation Laboratory, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
National University of Singapore · SGSingapore National Eye Center · SGNanyang Technological University · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to develop a deep-learning algorithm to automatically segment optic nerve head (ONH) and macula structures in three-dimensional (3D) wide-field optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans and to assess whether 3D ONH or macula structures (or a combination of both) provide the best diagnostic power for glaucoma. Methods: A cross-sectional comparative study was performed using 319 OCT scans of glaucoma eyes and 298 scans of nonglaucoma eyes. Scans were compensated to improve deep-tissue visibility. We developed a deep-learning algorithm to automatically label major tissue structures, trained with 270 manually annotated B-scans. The performance was assessed using the Dice coefficient (DC). A glaucoma classification algorithm (3D-CNN) was then designed using 500 OCT volumes and corresponding automatically segmented labels. This algorithm was trained and tested on three datasets: cropped scans of macular tissues, those of ONH tissues, and wide-field scans. The classification performance for each dataset was reported using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: Our segmentation algorithm achieved a DC of 0.94 ± 0.003. The classification algorithm was best able to diagnose glaucoma using wide-field scans, followed by ONH scans, and finally macula scans, with AUCs of 0.99 ± 0.01, 0.93 ± 0.06 and 0.91 ± 0.11, respectively. Conclusions: This study showed that wide-field OCT may allow for significantly improved glaucoma diagnosis over typical OCTs of the ONH or macula. Translational Relevance: This could lead to mainstream clinical adoption of 3D wide-field OCT scan technology.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic DiskArtificial IntelligenceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID38197730
PMCPMC10787590
OpenAlexW4390694603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.