Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38197612›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024

Invariant Molecular Representations for Heterogeneous Catalysis.

Jawad Chowdhury, Charles Fricke, Olajide Bamidele, Mubarak Bello, Wenqiang Yang, Andreas Heyden, Gabriel Terejanu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jawad ChowdhuryDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States.
Charles FrickeDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8892-7916
Olajide BamideleDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6020-4879
Mubarak BelloDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.
Wenqiang YangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5839-4159
Andreas HeydenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4939-7489
Gabriel TerejanuDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8934-9836

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catalyst screening is a critical step in the discovery and development of heterogeneous catalysts, which are vital for a wide range of chemical processes. In recent years, computational catalyst screening, primarily through density functional theory (DFT), has gained significant attention as a method for identifying promising catalysts. However, the computation of adsorption energies for all likely chemical intermediates present in complex surface chemistries is computationally intensive and costly due to the expensive nature of these calculations and the intrinsic idiosyncrasies of the methods or data sets used. This study introduces a novel machine learning (ML) method to learn adsorption energies from multiple DFT functionals by using invariant molecular representations (IMRs). To do this, we first extract molecular fingerprints for the reaction intermediates and later use a Siamese-neural-network-based training strategy to learn invariant molecular representations or the IMR across all available functionals. Our Siamese network-based representations demonstrate superior performance in predicting adsorption energies compared with other molecular representations. Notably, when considering mean absolute values of adsorption energies as 0.43 eV (PBE-D3), 0.46 eV (BEEF-vdW), 0.81 eV (RPBE), and 0.37 eV (scan+rVV10), our IMR method has achieved the lowest mean absolute errors (MAEs) of 0.18 0.10, 0.16, and 0.18 eV, respectively. These results emphasize the superior predictive capacity of our Siamese network-based representations. The empirical findings in this study illuminate the efficacy, robustness, and dependability of our proposed ML paradigm in predicting adsorption energies, specifically for propane dehydrogenation on a platinum catalyst surface.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAdsorptionAnimalsCatalysisCattle

Identifiers

PMID38197612
PMCPMC10806804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.