ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2024
[Research progress of stationary phase of gas chromatography based on chiral organic frameworks].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and application of chiral separation technology based on chiral metal-organic frameworks.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- [A comprehensive undergraduate experiment: preparation and chromatographic evaluation of a core-shell stationary phase based on a covalent organic framework].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2024Article
- [Chiral porous organic cage used as stationary phase for gas chromatographic separation of chiral and achiral compounds].Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enantiomers typically show different pharmacological, toxicological, and physiological properties. Thus, the preparation of enantiopure compounds is of great significance for human health and sustainable development. Compared with asymmetric catalysis, enantiomeric separation is simpler, faster, and more efficient; as such, it has become the preferred method for obtaining pure enantiomers. At present, enantiomeric separation methods mainly include chromatography, nanochannel membrane separation, selective adsorption, and recrystallization. In particular, gas chromatography (GC) plays an important role in enantioseparation because of its high sensitivity, excellent reproducibility, and outstanding processing capacity for various enantiomers. The stationary phase is key to the separation efficiency of GC, and more efficient, stable, and cost-effective materials that could serve as stationary phases are constantly being explored. Organic frameworks, such as covalent organic frameworks (COFs), metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), porous organic cages (POCs), metal-organic cages (MOCs), and hydrogen-bonded organic frameworks (HOFs), possess large specific surface areas, high porosities, tunable pore sizes, and easy functionalization, rendering them promising candidates for the separation of mixed analytes. Research has shown that the use of organic frameworks as stationary phases for GC results in excellent column efficiency and high resolution for various analytes, including
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.