Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196953›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Topic models with elements of neural networks: investigation of stability, coherence, and determining the optimal number of topics.

Sergei Koltcov, Anton Surkov, Vladimir Filippov, Vera Ignatenko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sergei KoltcovLaboratory for Social and Cognitive Informatics, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Anton SurkovLaboratory for Social and Cognitive Informatics, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Vladimir FilippovScientific Research Institute for Optoelectronic Instrument Engineering, Sosnovy Bor, Leningrad Region, Russia.
Vera IgnatenkoLaboratory for Social and Cognitive Informatics, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
National Research University Higher School of Economics · RUScientific Research Institute of Optoelectronic Instrumentation · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topic modeling is a widely used instrument for the analysis of large text collections. In the last few years, neural topic models and models with word embeddings have been proposed to increase the quality of topic solutions. However, these models were not extensively tested in terms of stability and interpretability. Moreover, the question of selecting the number of topics (a model parameter) remains a challenging task. We aim to partially fill this gap by testing four well-known and available to a wide range of users topic models such as the embedded topic model (ETM), Gaussian Softmax distribution model (GSM), Wasserstein autoencoders with Dirichlet prior (W-LDA), and Wasserstein autoencoders with Gaussian Mixture prior (WTM-GMM). We demonstrate that W-LDA, WTM-GMM, and GSM possess poor stability that complicates their application in practice. ETM model with additionally trained embeddings demonstrates high coherence and rather good stability for large datasets, but the question of the number of topics remains unsolved for this model. We also propose a new topic model based on granulated sampling with word embeddings (GLDAW), demonstrating the highest stability and good coherence compared to other considered models. Moreover, the optimal number of topics in a dataset can be determined for this model.

Indexed as

CoherenceNeural topic modelsOptimal number of topicsRenyi entropyStabilityTopic modelingWord embeddings

Identifiers

PMID38196953
PMCPMC10773852
OpenAlexW4390539013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.