Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196926›Full record

ReviewTrauma surgery & acute care open2024

Blood product use for radiological/nuclear trauma: product development and US regulatory considerations.

Toby A Silverman, Annette M Shadiack, Kimberly A Hofmeyer, Ashley E Cecere, Derek L Eisnor, Corey M Hoffman, Shannon G Loelius, Aditiben Patel, Mary J Homer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Toby A SilvermanTunnell Government Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Annette M ShadiackTunnell Government Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kimberly A HofmeyerBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Ashley E CecereBiomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Derek L EisnorDivision of Clinical Development, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Corey M HoffmanDivision of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Medical Countermeasure, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Shannon G LoeliusDivision of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Medical Countermeasure, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Aditiben PatelDivision of Regulatory and Quality Affairs, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Mary J HomerDivision of Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Medical Countermeasure, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4895-7672
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood products are likely to be critical components of the medical response to nuclear detonation, as the hematopoietic subsyndrome of acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) includes depletion of platelets and red blood cells that can lead to lethal hemorrhage and anemia. There is, however, only limited clinical information on the use of blood products to treat H-ARS. As currently configured, the US blood supply cannot meet the predicted surge in blood product demand that is likely to occur short-term and possibly long-term in the event of a large nuclear detonation. As part of the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response within the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) is addressing this preparedness gap by supporting the development of novel blood products and devices with characteristics that improve blood product storage and use in austere operational environments. The US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) recently issued draft guidance on the development of drugs and biologics regulated by CDER to prevent or treat Acute Radiation Syndrome under the provisions of the "Animal Rule." The commentary provided here discusses the unique regulatory scheme for transfusion components and blood products regulated as biological drugs by Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, including the ambiguity surrounding the evidentiary requirements for their approval for H-ARS, and whether, under certain circumstances, a specific H-ARS indication is necessary if relevant commercial indications are approved.

Indexed as

biomedical researchbloodhemorrhagepolicy

Identifiers

PMID38196926
PMCPMC10773416
OpenAlexW4390698495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.