Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196783›Full record

ArticleJournal of metabolic and bariatric surgery2023

Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as Revisional Surgery After Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Karim Ataya, Al Moutuz Al Jaafreh, Hussein El Bourji, Ayman Bsat, Hussein Nassar, Amir Al Ayoubi, George Abi Saad

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Karim AtayaDepartment of Bariatric Surgery, Kings College Hospital London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9235-5313
Al Moutuz Al JaafrehDepartment of Bariatric Surgery, Kings College Hospital London, London, UK.
Hussein El BourjiDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2437-965X
Ayman BsatDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5200-6111
Hussein NassarDepartment of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4022-6325
Amir Al AyoubiLebanese University Faculty of Medical Sciences, Hadath, Lebanon.
George Abi SaadDepartment of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
American University of Beirut Medical Center · LBKing's College - North Carolina · USLebanese University · LBRoyal London Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of revisional procedures, namely Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) following unsuccessful laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included 817 patients (404 in OAGB group, 413 in RYGB group) from seven retrospective comparative studies. Data on sample size, demographics, perioperative complications, operative time, pre- and post-revisional body mass index, total weight loss, and global weight loss over follow-up were extracted. Results: The mean operative time was 98.2-201 minutes for RYGB versus 78.7-168 minutes for OAGB. Despite classical RYGB gastric bypass taking longer, mini gastric bypass resulted in greater weight loss than RYGB, with a mean difference of -5.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], -6.74 to -4.94; P<0.00001; I Conclusion: OAGB was performed more quickly and boasted greater total weight loss and higher diabetes remission rates compared to RYGB after failed sleeve gastrectomy. However, OAGB also demonstrated a higher incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease. Thus, careful patient selection is essential when considering OAGB. Trial Registration: PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023474966.

Indexed as

Gastric bypassMetabolic surgeryRoux-en-Y gastric bypassSurgical revisionWeight reduction

Identifiers

PMID38196783
PMCPMC10771971
OpenAlexW4390422407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.