Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38196733›Full record

ReviewJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2023

Narrative review: erector spinae block in spine surgery.

Divesh Sachdev, Garrett Mamikunian, Cameron Kia, Hanbing Zhou

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07514806 (Estimation of Intraoperative Anaesthetic Drug Requirement in General Anaesthesia With or Without Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07514806 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Estimation of Intraoperative Anaesthetic Drug Requirement in General Anaesthesia With or Without Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorBangladesh Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsSpondylolisthesis, Analgesia, Postoperative, ESPBArmsControl Group: General Anesthesia Without Erector Spinae Plane Block, Intervention Group: General Anesthesia With Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Divesh SachdevChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Garrett MamikunianChicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cameron KiaDivision of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hanbing ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bone and Joint Institute, Harford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science · USHartford Financial Services (United States)Midwest Orthopaedic Research Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spine surgery is an ever-increasing procedure with multiple analgesia techniques utilized for postoperative pain control. More recently, erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks have been used to limit the use of opioids after surgery. The authors aimed to review the current literature on ESP blocks and its potential use in the outpatient setting. Methods: Several randomized controlled trials were evaluated that compared erector spinae block to traditional anesthesia where the primary outcome of postoperative opioid use was assessed. Randomized control trials comparative studies were also evaluated to assess erector spinae block effect on outpatient procedures. Secondary outcomes include, postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, patient length of stay, and post-operative complications. Key Content and Findings: Erector spinae block was found in general to lower postoperative opioid use compared to traditional anesthesia. In addition, the authors found improved patient satisfaction and less postoperative pain in the erector spinae cohort. Post-operative complications were lower in the erector spinae block group compared to traditional anesthesia, especially in regards to vomiting and nausea. Conclusions: While these studies do possess their limitations due to the low number of randomized control studies on erector spinae block, early data does suggest that erector spinae block appears to be superior to that of traditional anesthesia for those undergoing spine surgery.

Indexed as

Erector spinae blocklumbar surgeryorthopedics

Identifiers

PMID38196733
PMCPMC10772661
OpenAlexW4390083558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.